• Cornellius

    Overall good article, but I feel like there wasn’t a strong enough stance among the information. Why beat around the bush and mention “…students from different backgrounds” and later “from low-performing high schools” without actually diving into the statistics and evidence of who the lower performing students might be? Wouldn’t forwardness be a better way to ensure that Cornell may “draw national attention to these issues may contribute to the conversation”?

    • Cornellius

      Or directly mention some of the “programs offered by the University that suggest otherwise”