To the Editor: We, the undersigned students and recent alumni of the Department of Development Sociology, unequivocally condemn the proposed integration of DSOC into a new social sciences-specific college. The word “sociology” in Development Sociology does not mean that DSOC is a conventional social science in the vein of anthropology or linguistics. The word instead stems from the department’s commitment to rural sociology — a unique discipline that studies access to natural resources and sustainable livelihoods, particularly in communities on the peripheries of global capitalism. DSOC is an applied form of sociology that concerns itself with critical issues surrounding agricultural and community development, making the the College of Agriculture and Life Sciences its perfect home. Crucially, DSOC enjoys exceptionally synergistic relationships with other CALS Departments that also center the empathetic study of the Global South, including International Agriculture & Rural Development and Global & Public Health Sciences. It’s not uncommon for DSOC undergraduates to double-major in peer CALS programs such as Environmental & Sustainability Sciences, a further reflection of the department’s interdisciplinary nature and fundamental importance to the larger CALS community. We believe that extricating DSOC from an impressive array of top-ranked and interconnected development-focused programs in CALS would irrevocably damage the college’s excellence in purpose-driven science. Further, we refuse to let this misguided merger proposal interrupt our department’s cutting-edge research on global problems that threaten us all: anthropogenic climate-change, natural resource maldistribution, destructive market inequalities, disruptions to food systems and so much more. As DSOC students concerned with maintaining the integrity of our department, we stand in solidarity with the Stop the Merger campaign organized by members of the ILR, Human Ecology, DSOC and Communication communities. In the wake of such resounding opposition, it is abundantly clear that the Committee on Organizational Structures in the Social Science’s proposed “College of Social Sciences” is a project that will only harm our various disciplines. We hope that the campus community will join us in opposing the merger, and in opposing all attacks on the integrity and independence of academic departments that center the betterment of human lives over the maximization of profits.
Sierra Murray DSOC ’17Samantha Kreda DSOC ’17Sonya Qamar DSOC ’17Christopher Hanna DSOC ’18Tessa Schneider DSOC ’18Paige Wagar DSOC ’18, ESS ’18Maia Kunzman DSOC ’18, ESS ’18Ana Lopez DSOC ’18Ismini Ethridge DSOC ’18Emily Slifkin DSOC ’18Kathleen Donnelly Moran DSOC ’18, IARD ’18Anne Brenna DSOC ’18Evelyn Sanchez DSOC ’18Vanessa Amankwaa DSOC ’18Nina Möger Bengtsson DSOC ’18Elizabeth Gorman DSOC ’18Keshara Senanayake DSOC ’18Gillian Cowley DSOC ’18George Liu DSOC ’19Francesca Viazzoli DSOC ’19Xavier Salvador DSOC ’19Shivani Parikh DSOC ’19Amanda Sudilovsky DSOC ’19Dana Gelb DSOC ’19Noelle LaDue DSOC ’19Stevanica Augustine DSOC ’19, ESS ’19Deborah Glick DSOC ’19Anastashia Alfred DSOC ’20Minnie Jung DSOC ’20Oluwafunke Akinkuolie DSOC ’21Liam Sherer DSOC ’21Jenna Winocur DSOC ’21Christine Johnson DSOC ’21Hailey Andress DSOC ’21Esuvat Bomani DSOC ’21
