Recent Updates by Topic


Popular Opinion Pieces



Op-Ed

No Reason to Celebrate

Print: Print Story Email: Email Story Share: Share on Facebook Share on Digg
March 13, 2007 - 4:00am
By Laura Taylor

This past Thursday marked International Women’s Day. Women and men across the world commemorated the day in a variety of ways. In the Philippines, women protested against new anti-terrorism laws. In Bangladesh, women’s groups organized rallies. In Nablus, the West Bank city recently paralyzed by an Israeli invasion, hundreds marched on a military checkpoint and demanded a lifting of the international boycott on their government.

International Women’s Day is not simply a celebration of women. Rather, it is a political holiday that was originally declared by the Socialist Party of America in 1909. A strike by women textile workers on that day in 1917 marked the beginning of the Russian Revolution — an uprising that, before Stalin’s counterrevolution, granted full rights to women including communal childcare, the right to divorce and free abortion on demand.

International Women’s Day is a day to celebrate the strides that women have made towards equality and to bring awareness to the struggles that still exist for women’s liberation.

One look at the news coming out of Iraq shows us why this continued struggle is necessary.

The gender composition of the U.S. Armed Forces has changed dramatically in the last century. Today, more women serve in the military than in any other time, with more than 160,000 having served in the Middle East since 2003. Unfortunately, not all the numbers on gender coming out of the military are so positive — most notably, those on rape and sexual assault.

The U.S. military, given its desperate need for new recruits, is happy to welcome women into its ranks. However, it appears that there is no guarantee that these women won’t be abused because of their gender.

A Senate hearing in 2004 listened to testimony that the military was grossly negligent on the topic of sexual abuse in the armed forces. Emergency care and rape kits were almost impossible to come by, and allegations were barely investigated.

However, this negligence is not due to a lack of incidents. Statistics on rape are exceedingly difficult to tabulate, especially within the military. However, one study of earlier veterans of war found that around 30 percent of women were raped or sexually assaulted by one of their fellow soldiers. A study done in 2003 at the Air Force Academy in Colorado found that one-fifth of female cadets had been the victim of at least one completed or attempted assault.

Reports within Iraq tell a similar story. Last year, it was reported that U.S. female soldiers were dying of dehydration in their sleep. In order to prevent dehydration in the searing heat of Iraq, it is necessary to drink a great deal of water. However, reports found that many women stopped drinking liquids around 4 p.m. Why did women specifically do this? Female soldiers reported they were afraid to get up in the middle of the night to use the latrines alone after hearing that men waited nearby at night, abusing and raping women that passed by themselves.

Members of the military are beginning to come forward to report their own sexual assault experiences. Army Specialist Suzanne Swift was recently released from military prison after refusing to be redeployed in 2006. Her primary reason for resisting: Swift says she was sexually abused by her commanding officers while in Iraq. She says that she tried to report abuse, but the Army took no action on her case. When she was arrested for refusing deployment, one of the officers who had abused her was put in charge of her supervision. Now out of prison but forced to remain in the Army until 2009, she encourages other women to stand against sexual abuse.

It is not just the woman within the U.S. military that are victims of this gender-based violence. Despite Bush’s proclamation that, after U.S. “liberation” of Iraq, “there won’t be any more mass graves and torture rooms and rape rooms,” the women of Iraq are telling a different story.

One gruesome example — a group of at least three American soldiers stationed near the town of Al-Mahmudiyah stalked, raped and murdered 15-year-old Abeer Kasim Hamza, only after killing her father, mother and 5-year-old sister. In an attempt to cover up what they had done, the soldiers set the lower half of Abeer’s body on fire. Abu Firas Janabi, a cousin of Abeer’s mother, who saw the bodies, said, “Never in my mind could I have imagined such a gruesome sight.” Originally, the military attributed the killing to “insurgent activity.”

We hear much boasting from the Bush administration about the Iraqi security forces that the U.S. is training. Unfortunately, it appears they are learning how to abuse women from the U.S. military forces as well. Recently, 20-year-old Sabrine al-Janabi told al-Jazerra about her brutal gang rape at the hands of three Iraqi policemen. Despite being dismissed by Prime Minister al-Maliki as “a liar,” the New York Times reported that the Iraqi nurse who treated Janabi found signs of sexual assault.

Riverbend, an Iraqi woman who writes a blog about conditions in the country since the invasion, wrote passionately, “Everyone knows American forces and Iraqi security forces are raping women (and men), but [Janabi] is possibly the first woman who publicly comes out and tells about it using her actual name … She’s just one of tens, possibly hundreds, of Iraqi women who are violated in their own homes and in Iraqi prisons.”

We have been told by the Bush administration that we went to war in Afghanistan and Iraq in part to “liberate” the women of those countries. However, how the military has treated women, both those within its ranks and those it supposedly sought to free, shows its complete lack of respect for women as equals in this world.

Laura Taylor is a senior in the School of Industrial and Labor Relations. She can be contacted at lat34@cornell.edu. Kind of a Big Deal appears Tuesdays.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Can You Read?

There are quite a few things wrong with this column, so I guess I'll just skim through them.

1. Saying "it was reported" and "one study" are not credible sources. Perhaps citing these works would lend some credence to these studies.

3. Is there a problem with sexual assault in the military? Yes. Should it be addressed? Yes. Is this column going to help? Not at all. Instead of addressing the issue with maturity, Ms. Taylor uses this issue to broadly make a case against the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.

For espousing a violent ideology such as socialism (and Lenin did not discriminate in murder), Ms. Taylor sure loves to dishonor the many tidroops that are protecting her overseas. This column has shifted from amusng to absurd, and not even worth my time anymore.

You can not be serious. In

You can not be serious. In Muslim society, men are allowed to beat and rape their wives. Muslim women are routinely the victims of incest, sexual mutilation and "honor killings" -- and it's the US that's abusive of women?

"No reason to celebrate"- Laura Taylor

I have never been insulted by such assanine comments as the jackass who accused Muslim men of being allowed to rape and beat their wives. MOre insulting was the accusation of genital mutilation, incest and honur killings.

Honur killings are practiced by both Muslims and Christians in the Arab world. Genital mutilation is an African custom. Furthermore it is forbidden to commit incest in our faith. The accusation of rape and spousal abuse is laughable to any intelligent person. Ask me, I'm from South Africa- you know- the RAPE CAPITAL of the world. I think we all know enough about the Vietnam war to know that GIs raped their way through that pitiful nation. In fact, European males have a remarkable history of raping their way through the darker-skinned continents.

The coloured/mixed race in South Africa accounts for the 3rd largest population. Their ancestors were originally black and asian slaves under the control of European male occupiers. Gee, wonder how that happened? I no for a fact it was not a champagne and roses romance!

The problem with this argument is that accuastions are levelled at Muslims to deflect attention from the crimes of Western nations.

Please do yourself a favour, take off those tinted rose coloured goggles and stop wallowing in this fantasy that America is the bringer of freedom, women's rights, blah, blah.

You know I'm not surprised that so many Americans support the Apartheid state of ISrael.Israel, like America originated from the slaughter, humiliation, rape, and enslavement of other peoples. No wonder you and Israel have so much in common.

And oh by the way, the word "Apartheid" is an Afrikaans word meaning "separation". Interesting, condering that Israel is building the euphamsitically labelled "separation fence".

Take this "Column" for what it is....

Look, Laura Taylor has proven time and again that she is incapable of performing even the most basic research. She lacks intellect, credibilty, and critical reasoning skills. Her columns prove this out week after week and no serious person could ever consider her a legitimate source of information. This column is published purely for its entertainment value - it has to be because it is of no more journalistic value than the Cornell American. Take it for what it is, a joke, and leave it at that.

wow

sorry folks. you're gonna have to try a bit harder than that to discredit Laura this time.

to the first poster:
1. have you ever read a newspaper or watched a news broadcast? saying "it was reported" or citing "one study" is common practice. to prevent articles and shows from turning into boring dissertations, people will frequently use such shorthand, or in many cases, they will not bother to add any citations or footnotes at all. hell, in many cases they are talking out of their ass, while this article is based on recent news reports and studies that are quite credible. instead of bashing her, why not ask for more factual support. i'm sure she'll be happy to provide it to you. or is it just easier to insult someone than to learn something?

2. you are concerned with dishonoring troops. so what exactly dishonors troops more...Laura's attempt to bring to light a rarely reported but horrific issue that we should be ashamed of, or you trying to cast it aside by making some flippant comment about maturity,while ignoring the fact that maybe we need to spend more time thinking about whether a hypocritical military that attacked another country, claiming they held the moral high ground, has the right to do so when we can be just as disgusting and immoral as anyone else....to our own troops

to the second poster:
1. and why can she not be serious? did you actually read her article? can you please show me the point where Laura says those things are not happening to Muslim women? seriously, i can't seem to find it. now, as you are likely a Cornell student, you can't possibly be ignorant enough to think that because a writer might be highlighting the abuses against one group of women, that she is ignoring or belittling or having some competition against the abuses that another group suffers. and you certainly can't be heartless enough to think that because those terrible abuses of Muslim women occur, that Laura's point about the well documented abuses of women in our armed forces is any less important or that it makes us the "better" group of people. so, are you serious...and if so, what the hell are you trying to say?

to the third poster:
1. you say week after week huh?....rather than whining, why not be constructive and from now on, in this posting section, ask her to cite the points you are skeptical about. ask her for her sources. hell, start now, i'm sure she'd be happy to supply them to you right here. oh, and as for an article that refers to a nationally known issue like the rape of our troops...you're right...clearly for entertainment value. i'm sure that's exactly what she had in mind when writing it...sicko.

The far left loses the moral

The far left loses the moral high ground when it becomes so hypocritical. Laura is a perfect example. Week after week she takes every issue and then attempts to bash Israel. Israel is the only country in the Middle East where women vote, get abortions, get access to birth control, marry freely, date freely, wear what they want ... the list goes on. If Laura actually cared about the rights of women she would talk about how more countries in the Middle East should follow Israel's model - not go on a leftist rant.

It appears that Ms. Taylor

It appears that Ms. Taylor got the idea for this column, as well as some of her actual paragraphs-paraphrased but taken directly--from this interview transcript:

http://www.democracynow.org/article.pl?sid=07/03/08/1443232

"Last year, it was reported that U.S. female soldiers were dying of dehydration in their sleep. "

The source of this story is Col. (formerly General) Janis Karpinski who "testified" about this story in front of a mock trial for crimes of humanity committed by Bush. Not exactly CNN. Also Karpinski was demoted because she was in charge of the unit that tortured prisoners at Abu Gharib. She's not exactly a credible source, given that she has a vendetta after being demoted. She appears to be the ONLY source for this story.

The story is further debunked here:
http://www.mudvillegazette.com/archives/004141.html

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.