Opinion

White is / White Isn't: Meditations on being part of the majority

March 11, 2008 - 12:00am
By Evan Baker Smith

This article is for white people. If you are not white, feel free to keep reading, but know that this article was not written for you; no, this article is for white people. White people, this article seeks to turn the analytical looking glass around on ourselves, seeks to spark an open and honest dialogue about who we are and how we came to be. It is a Discovery Channel expose on whiteness, if you will, and at the same time an urgent call for us to be brave and seriously analyze how our whiteness affects the world we live in. White people, who are we?

This question probably sounds absurd. Who are we? Although we often ask this question of other ethnic groups, we are seldom asked to answer this inquiry ourselves. It would seem that this is true because we are so apparently diverse, but in reality, we simply have not developed the language necessary to adequately describe Whiteness. Remember, language is not created in a vacuum; it is created within specific historical contexts of power. Who are we? We are men and women, rich and poor, rural and urban, religious to varying degrees, and of a plurality of political persuasions. We certainly are not monolithic. But given these various differences, who are we? Have we any commonalities unique to us? It is a difficult question to answer, so let us look at other cultures to see if we can find insight.

We all know what “minority” cultures are: Black Culture is dancing, jazz and hip hop, soul food, Baptist churches, Martin Lawrence, ebonics and basketball. Similarly, Latino culture is Salsa and Merengue (the dances and the music), rice and beans, soccer and baseball, machismo, George Lopez and Catholicism while Asian culture is sushi and noodles, studying, respecting elders and acting dutifully reserved. Of course these are all stereotypes, but for all practical purposes, these are important markers of “ethnic” cultures that we regularly discuss with confidence. Yet what is white culture?

Put simply, it does not exist, or rather, we have no words to describe it. Our Whiteness is at once an all pervasive everything and a profound nothingness. It is everything that is not “ethnic.” Thus, Whiteness is the central focal point against which everything else is measured. We, more than anything else, define for ourselves what humanity is. Whiteness has come to mean good, smart, civilized and deserving; whiteness is, in essence, “humanity.” Our Western values are “enlightened,” and because of them we are saved and seek to save others. Human rights and the rhetoric of freedom have become the new Christianity for which we wage crusades (to use George Bush II’s word).

In contrast, Blackness serves as the ideological pole against which whiteness is defined. Black has quite literally come to mean, bad, dumb, ugly and bestial. We constantly refer to the negative as black: Black Friday, black sheep, blacklisted, blackballed, blackmail, black market, etc. Where did these terms come from? I do not know, but I would argue that they serve to preserve an ideology of white supremacy.

In between these poles, we place various other ethnicities, which we locate somewhere Blackness and Whiteness, and sometimes off the axis entirely.

It is also important to note here that neo-Nazi white power rhetoric does not need to be prevalent for us to cling to our whiteness. When we define Blackness as dumb, bad, ugly, and undeserving, we necessarily define Whiteness as favorable, something we are glad to possess. Blackness then becomes the negative affirmation of us, and forces us to hold tightly to our valuable Whiteness.

As the celebrated French philosopher Jean-Paul Sartre noted a half century ago, the world was filled with 2 billion inhabitants; that is, 500,000 human beings and 1.5 billion “natives.” Europe had completed its domination of the globe, and effectively named the world in accordance with its colonial order. Europeans were now “Men,” with all the rights of Man, and non-Europeans were now “natives,” considered to be the burden of Man. Since Sartre first made this comment, a lot has changed: most colonies have become independent (nominally at least), capitalist democracy has triumphed over Soviet communism, and the technological revolution has brought all corners of the world into instant contact. But how much has really changed? I don’t know …

So white people, who are we?

You are you, and I am I. We are individuals, and our individuality is protected by our whiteness. In other words, our whiteness affords us the privilege of individuality. I’ve never had to speak on behalf of the white community. Conversely, what then is the effect on other peoples when we deny them the freedom to define themselves and name the world in which they live? As Paolo Freire wrote some 40 years ago, “To speak a true word is to transform the world.” Freedom then is the ability to name and transform the world in which we live.

I would argue, then, that as white people, most of us enjoy considerably more freedom than people of color. I would also argue that as white people, most of us are not entirely free, but rather that we are similarly kept unfree by the meaning-making class that denies us the right to name and transform the world. Since those who own the means of physical production also own the means of intellectual production, most of us whites in the U.S. are kept from our liberation by a system controlled by the wealthy.

If you disagree with what I’ve written, that is okay (and thanks for reading this far). None of us have been trained to think about Whiteness (indeed, there does not exist a White Studies Department at Cornell). Like all other endeavors, meditating on our Whiteness will take practice and patience. It will also require that we create new knowledge and language that empowers us. Let us as a community initiate an open and honest dialogue about what it means to white and how our Whiteness affects the world. Only when we begin to understand ourselves more accurately can we begin to rectify past mistakes and work effectively towards creating the conditions of our own liberation.

Evan Baker-Smith is a senior in the College of Arts and Sciences. He can be contacted at ebsmith@cornellsun.com. Praxis Makes Perfect will appear alternate Tuesdays this semester.



Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

There is a White Studies

There is a White Studies Department at Cornell; it's called the College of Arts and Sciences.

"We all know what

"We all know what “minority” cultures are: Black Culture is dancing, jazz and hip hop, soul food, Baptist churches, Martin Lawrence, ebonics and basketball. Similarly, Latino culture is Salsa and Merengue (the dances and the music), rice and beans, soccer and baseball, machismo, George Lopez and Catholicism while Asian culture is sushi and noodles, studying, respecting elders and acting dutifully reserved. Of course these are all stereotypes, but for all practical purposes, these are important markers of “ethnic” cultures that we regularly discuss with confidence. Yet what is white culture?"

It's funny that in stereotyping and shortchanging the cultures you mentioned, you succumb to the stereotype that whites are culturally and socially oblivious, yet discuss social and cultural matters "with confidence". Of course, "we all know" that such and such culture is such and such. Of course.

I'm going to assume you meant African-American culture when you said black culture...I don't think jazz, baptist churches, ebonics, or basketball are very popular in Africa. Now Martin Lawrence on the other hand...

I'm also pretty sure George Lopez isn't that popular outside of the States where, somehow, most Latinos live.

I'm not sure how this paragraph made it through.

White has come to be Anglo-Saxon, Protestant Ethic

In America, White most frequently means people of British, Irish, German, or French descent. For a long time, groups like the Jews and Italians were for some reason NOT considered white. Only now as the country is becoming truly multicultural are we "expanding the ranks" of who is white to keep from DUN DUN DUN, becoming a minority.

Also, "white" nearly universally refers to adhering to a Christian religion, though Protestant is probably closer to what "white is" than Catholic (because Protestantism is more widely practiced and accepted as "mainstream")

Ridiculous

I'm not sure why this article was allowed to be published. I'm white (Jewish though) and think that this article was completely inappropriate. I'm not one of those people who takes up arms against any issue and is out to call people racist, but I can't help but think this article crossed the line.

DIALOGUE

why do you think this article crossed the line? im truly interested in hearing your thoughts.

i personally think it brought up good points concerning whiteness and our need to seriously analyze it in relation to other (invented) identities of race and ethnicity. i agree with Baker-Smith when he espouses the need to dialogue regarding whiteness; what are some many of us white people scared about? why do we become defensive when race is brought to the table? these are serious questions that require serious investigation.

in the spirit of camaraderie and progress towards social justice,

AC '05

Whiteness

The Balkanization of humanity into social, economic and racial classes and groups is always a fun and interesting topic—thanks for bringing it up yet again. It appears that the last thing the white fish discovers is water: they’re swimming in their own beliefs and unable to allow others to do likewise? White Guilt once again shows its pretty head, wrings its nervous hands and say’s “We’re sorry to all the people we never offended.” The fallout: more giveaways to non-white communities to assuage that guilt. See, White Guilt is PART of the White psyche—does any element of Jesse’s rainbow coalition feel guilt for any accomplishment or contribution to humanity they make? Of course not—only the Whites are so afflicted.

Part of paying a debt one doesn’t owe to a series of undeserving groups necessarily includes an admission that because you're White you're guilty…of what? Why, of being White and nothing more. Personally, I think they ought to free all the slaves and jail all the slave holders—but hold: there are neither and haven’t been for a century (unless you count African Slavery and Slavers—alive and well today).

And as recipients of a much better world, due in large part to White ingenuity (you’re about to type your sibilant retort on computer = White), would they, could they possibly take advantage of White Guilt? Ask Rev’s Jesse and Al then just look around at all the Grievance Studies abounding in Higher Ed today for your answer.

Whitey: beating up on yourself and examining your White Navel Lint for cosmic answers is ludicrous. Do what you normally do: out produce, out perform and live life happily, the rest are catching up.

Evan Baker-Smith, you are about to step into a world where theories get blown away every day. For your graduation present I give you a free advice: “In theory, practice and theory are the same; in practice they are not.” Tattoo that on your arm and stop sniveling, stand up straight and go compete. The only appropriate phrase Grievance Studies should teach their graduates: “Do you want fries with that.”

While I do agree that

While I do agree that 'White' culture in the states is more defined by mainstream media, I don't think its necessarily defined by what it isn't. While stereotypically many things you bring up are associated with other ethnic groups, I wouldn't define my whiteness as not being a part of a bapstist church or not listening to hip hop etc. I do feel there is a void in what is 'white' - most often I think of protestantism, shitty network TV shows like the office and 24 - but i don't think whiteness is defined by being cultured or ignoring hip hop and listening to emo/cutting oneself. I think you make some good points here but I don't agree that being white means avoiding stereotypical 'minority activities'.

You took your post way too

You took your post way too far. You mention all the minorites, but why do you have to mention the Black minority more than once? I do not see why you have to bring out the negative in everything either; your post sounds very racist and too me, you seem like a White supremacist.

great article!

Evan, I just want to offer my support for your article--it does an awesome job of spelling out a conversation that white folks need to have. They need to understand themselves better than they do, ALONG WITH understanding others.

macon d

http://stuffwhitepeopledo.blogspot.com/

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.