Recent Updates by Topic




Op-Ed

Veep Debate Recap? 'You Betcha!'

Print: Print Story Email: Email Story Share: Share on Facebook Share on Digg
October 5, 2008 - 11:00pm
By Cody Gault

After the vice presidential debate last Thursday a decree was heard echoing across the land: Sarah Palin passed the test. She managed to get through the whole debate without falling on her face.

Where was I when we decided that not failing miserably is equivalent to succeeding? When did mediocrity become a qualification — perhaps even an asset — for running a country?

Palin rose overnight from virtual obscurity to the forefront of American politics with a “common touch” and “down home” values.

But enough is enough. Palin is as calculating a politician as there ever was. Take, for instance, her opening remarks at the debate.

“I think a good barometer here, as we try to figure out has this been a good time or a bad time in America's economy, is (pause) go to a kid’s soccer game on Saturday, and turn to any parent there on the sideline and ask them, ‘How are you feeling about the economy?’ And I betcha, you’re going to hear some fear in that parent’s voice.”

No one needs a barometer. It is abundantly clear that the economy is in shambles — making this allegory a vehicle for showing off how down-to-earth she thinks she is. The way she paused before jumping into her cutesy story was nothing more than a poor attempt to make a rehearsed, calculated move seem off-the-cuff and authentic.

And I betcha that fear we’re hearing doubles with the prospect of Palin at the helm.

In a time when deregulation of the American financial industry is threatening a global recession, Palin is running on a free-market platform. “Government, you know, you’re not always a solution. In fact, too often you’re the problem.”

I’ll give her credit for sticking to her guns during a crisis, but what else would you expect from a lifetime member of the NRA?

Despite what she claims, Palin isn’t a straight shooter — even by political standards. When Biden pointed out that McCain was out of touch with the economic crisis in claiming that the fundamentals of the economy were strong just days before the meltdown, Palin responded with the highly untrue but bulletproof retort that “[McCain] was talking about the American workforce. And the American workforce is the greatest in this world,” and sealed it with a wink only Bill Clinton could pull off.

She then went on to momentarily forget which team she was on. “We’re tired of the old politics as usual. And that’s why, with all due respect, I do respect your years in the U.S. Senate, but I think Americans are craving something new and different and that new energy and that new commitment that’s going to come with reform.” Obama, no?

Palin had a lot more to say to Joe Six-Pack than she did to Joe Biden. “I may not answer the questions that either the moderator or you want to hear, but I’m going to talk straight to the American people.” Perhaps this might have been a noble sentiment if it wasn’t a copout.

Biden, on the other hand, showed up to the debate and did exactly what a vice presidential candidate should do — he demonstrated that he is qualified and ready to be president himself and that he believes in the man he’s sharing the ticket with. He spoke eloquently and decisively, and may even have performed better in his debate than Obama did against McCain in Mississippi.

Biden did, however, stumble in a few key areas.

For instance, he called for gay couples to be awarded the same constitutional rights and privileges as straight couples — but insisted he is definitively anti-gay marriage, “in the civil sense.”

You’d think that a man as well versed in American politics as Biden would know about the ramifications of “separate but equal” ideology.

Biden also prefaced far too many of his criticisms with “I love John McCain, but …” It made him seem a little too preoccupied with making sure he was still welcome at McCain’s poker nights, which might be fine if this campaign weren’t deciding the fate of the nation.

While all politicians have to go through the motions of “humanizing” themselves with stories about “Katie’s Restaurant” or Wasilla’s “Main Street,” Biden had the most genuine moment of the night in describing the loss of his wife and child and his struggle as a single parent. It was a refreshing — though sad — glimpse into the life that made the politician.

Palin, on the other hand, wears her life on her sleeve with such pride that — even if you accept that her “down home values” were a breath of fresh air for American politics to begin with — by the end of the debate her story was just as stale as McCain’s.

America loves a fairy tale, but this Cinderella is more likely to hunt and skin the mice than befriend them. And her prince races snowmobiles.

One can only hope that after Election Day, sanity will be restored, and the Abominable Snowperson will disappear back into the tundra as quickly as she came.

Cody Gault is a contributing columnist at The Sun and a sophomore in the College of Arts and Sciences. He can be contacted at cgault@cornellsun.com.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

VP Debate

Why did Gwen Ifill let Palin get away with not answering the questions that were asked?

Wow.

"One can only hope that after Election Day, sanity will be restored, and the Abominable Snowperson will disappear back into the tundra as quickly as she came."

The "Abominable Snowperson?"

How progressive of you!

With those two words, you manage not only to insult Alaskans everywhere -- too bad you can't simply fly over Alaska (that is, the "tundra") as you would the rest of middle America, eh? -- but you also continue to prove that liberals' calls for a woman in the White House (or, in this case, anywhere near it) only apply to, dare I say it, liberal women.

"America loves a fairy tale, but this Cinderella is more likely to hunt and skin the mice than befriend them. And her prince races snowmobiles."

Oh, the humanity! She's a -- a -- a HUNTER? And her husband -- *gulp* -- "race snowmobiles?"

But then -- then -- where do they ever find the time to windsurf?!

Next time you're 10,000 feet over the heartland, Mr. Gault, do consider stopping by: this may be tough to swallow, but the United States is not New York alone -- and vice versa.

You have a lot to learn about an America you seem to prefer to thumb your nose at than genuinely understand.

I think you'll find that we Abominable Snowpeople & Co. are a bit more three-dimensional than you give us credit for; sufferable, even.

And -- I know this is pushing it -- maybe, too, ultimately worthy of your respect.

"Biden, on the other hand,

"Biden, on the other hand, showed up to the debate and did exactly what a vice presidential candidate should do — he demonstrated that he is qualified and ready to be president himself and that he believes in the man he’s sharing the ticket with."

If by qualified and ready to be president, you mean completely rewriting history. Consider the following assertion by Biden from the debate:

"When we kicked -- along with France, we kicked Hezbollah out of Lebanon, I said and Barack said, 'Move NATO forces in there. Fill the vacuum, because if you don't know -- if you don't, Hezbollah will control it.' Now what's happened? Hezbollah is a legitimate part of the government in the country immediately to the north of Israel."

The US and France never kicked Hezballah of of Lebanon. This is just flat out wrong. Perhaps he is referring to the Cedar Revolution, where Lebanese demonstrations forced Syria to remove troops from Lebanon in 2005 (certainly the US and France did not do any "kicking out"), but I doubt Obama was busy giving foreign policy proclamations three months into his Senate term. The rest of the answer makes absolutely no sense. Hezballah has been in the Lebanese government since 1992, right around when Obama was graduating law school. UN "peacekeepers" have been in southern Lebanon since late 2006 and Hezballah has not only reamred but gained more political power, so Biden's made-up prescient advice to put NATO troops in Lebanon didn't even work. For the supposed foreign policy expert on the Democratic ticket, Biden is either extremely ignorant or incredibly confused. I can forgive the occasional slip of the tongue, but nothing in the above statement is even remotely true.

Ignorant and confused

"Biden is either extremely ignorant or incredibly confused."

Funny, Sarah Palin is both extremely ignorant and incredibly confused on every single topic - unless she has been supplied with sound bytes to memorize. Have you even seen her Katie Couric interview?

So what if Joe Biden may have stretched the facts a bit on that Hezballah issue. At least he knows what Hezballah IS, unlike Ms. "Wasilla Main Street".

"Funny, Sarah Palin is both

"Funny, Sarah Palin is both extremely ignorant and incredibly confused on every single topic - unless she has been supplied with sound bytes to memorize. Have you even seen her Katie Couric interview?"

Yes and she did not do very well. I will point out that one party is claiming that its VP candidate brings years of foreign policy "expertise" to the ticket while the other has not (excluding the stupid Russia-Alaska comment).

"So what if Joe Biden may have stretched the facts a bit on that Hezballah issue."

Making up historical events and fake responses to those made up events to prove some sort of foreign policy knowledge goes beyond "stretch[ing] the facts a bit," it is blatant lying. Coming from a man who should have been expelled from law school for academic plagiarism and who has already withdrawn from one presidential campaign for copying political speeches, you would think Biden would think before speaking so loosely.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.