News
News Analysis: Can McCain Come Back?
October 19, 2008 - 11:00pmThis is an updated version of an article that originally was printed on Oct. 19
“For all intents and purposes, McCain’s campaign is over. The physicians have pulled up the sheet, the executors of the estate are taking over. Paying bills and winding down—not strategizing, organizing, and getting the message out—will be the order of the day.”
Thus spake Charlie Cook, veteran political prophet and publisher of the widely read Cook Report. It’s a common sentiment among political observers two weeks before Election Day, as Barack Obama increasingly projects an aura of inevitability while John McCain increasingly channels Bob Dole.
There’s just one thing about Dr. Cook’s prognosis: He made it in July … July 2007, eight months before McCain clinched the Republican nomination. At the time, the outlook for the McCain appeared bleak—his cash-strapped campaign had all but collapsed under the weight of the Iraq War and comprehensive immigration reform—and Cook’s political obituary only echoed the conventional wisdom.
For months thereafter, McCain languished fourth or fifth in national and state polls. Bettors on Intrade—the world’s leading prediction market—gave the one-time Republican frontrunner less than a 5-percent shot of winning his party’s nomination, lower than rivals Rudy Giuliani, Mitt Romney, Fred Thompson, and Mike Huckabee.
“I was one of those people who thought he didn’t have a chance,” said Howard Fineman of Newsweek and MSNBC. “I was one of those people who compared the McCain supporters in New Hampshire to the Japanese soldiers in the Phillipines at the end of World War II who didn’t know the war was over. Well, it turns out there were a lot of those soldiers, metaphorically speaking. And they still came out of the hills in New Hampshire to turn things around for John McCain.”
Despite the historical backdrop of McCain’s unprecedented primary comeback, some Democrats are already uncorking the champagne. “You can call the dogs in, wet the fire, and leave the house,” said Democratic strategist James Carville after the second debate. “The hunt’s over.”
By all accounts, McCain’s chances of winning the election are slim (16%, according to Intrade)—and for reasons largely beyond his control. The candidate who planned to run a campaign centered on national security—his strong suit—now finds himself forced to talk about the economy, a subject even he has admitted he knows little about.
“If John McCain loses this race—and the polls would indicate that that’s likely to happen—I think you’d have to step back and say, unfortunately for him, he had a horrible year to run as a Republican,” said John Harwood of CNBC and the New York Times. “You have a public that is very dissatisfied with the Iraq War even though that’s not Topic A right now, that doesn’t like President Bush, doesn’t like the Republican Party, and was feeling anxious about the economy even before Wall Street melted down. And then when Wall Street melted down, that sort of solidified the cement on the idea that we’re headed in the wrong direction and made it much, much easier for Barack Obama to carry through that argument that what we need is change.”
For his part, Obama has strung together three compelling debate performances and has made inroads with demographics—like white working-class voters—that stayed cool to him during his primary battle with Hillary Clinton. He has surged ahead of McCain by 5-10 points in national polls and holds leads in states totaling 364 electoral votes (he needs 270). He sports the most formidable ground operation in campaign history, he just raised $150 million in September—almost three times the previous record, his own August total—and he now enjoys the support of one of one of the nation’s most respected elder statesmen, Retired General and former Bush Administration Secretary of State Colin Powell.
Make no mistake: At the current trajectory, Obama is poised for a landslide victory—and one would be foolish to expect otherwise. At the same time, though, Election 2008 has reminded us time and again to expect the unexpected (See: Mike Huckabee, Sarah Palin). In politics, one can rarely speak with certainty about tomorrow, much less weeks from tomorrow. 15 days remains an eternity, long enough for events to intercede and turn conventional wisdom on its head. Just ask President Hillary Clinton or Vice President Tim Pawlenty.
“Anyone who’s been around Senator McCain for any length of time knows never to count him out. He’s a fighter, he’s a scrapper, and he’s not someone you want to take for granted,” said Pawlenty, governor of Minnesota and the man assumed to be McCain’s running mate until Sarah Palin took the stage that morning in Dayton, Ohio.
“The pattern of John McCain’s life is to be left for dead, sometimes literally,” added Fineman. “Shot down over Vietnam, survives, comes back; Prisoner of war, comes back; Keating five scandal, comes back. And that pattern repeated itself in the primary … So that’s why you never want to count him out. And that’s why, with a few weeks left in the election, I’m not going to count him out because he’s a little bit like the trick birthday candle—you know, you think you’ve blown it out—and he flickers back to life.”
With 15 days to go, will Senator McCain flicker back to life? Doubtful, but there’s a second time for everything.

Not the way to win an election or prove you can Govern
The playbook on how to win as a Republican has run it's course. The fear and smear strategy of Karl Rove has not worked this time in the face of a protracted war, huge budget deficits and a poor economy. The inability to articulate a vision that will make their lives and the county better was a fatal flaw in tandem with personal attacks that many thought offensive.
The decision to nominate Sarah Palin was in my opinion the final straw or nail in the coffin. Senator Mc Cain tried to sell the notion that these are serious times requiring a serious and experienced candidate went by the way side with his selection of Governor Palin who were told to believe had the background, experience and knowledge to help guide this country in the future. It soon became evident that while a pretty and charming person, lacked the credentials to lead this nation. Worse, she relied on the tactics of fear and smear, demonstrated the lack of ability to think on her feet and appear, competent.
Senator Mc Cain could not bring himself to distance himself from or be critical of the failed policies that contributed to our problems and in the end all of the above resulted in independent voters and those unsure of the ability of Senator Obama to reject Senator Mc Cain.
Being elected President as a Republican this time would have been a difficult chore, however given a candidate with a strange name, from a Illinois, who is also black, was not a mission impossible. Winning required competency, common sense and focus on Governing and in the end Senator Mc Cain instead relied on the Karl Rove approach which was his undoing.
The Media on Hypocrisy John McCain
The Media on Hypocrisy of Senator John McCain
Community boards for programs such as the Chicago Annenberg Challenge normally comprise of volunteers with a variety of professional background and political affiliation. The first and foremost goal of any volunteer to serve or serving on such boards is to make as maximum contribution as possible to achieve the desired mission. The notion that a volunteer is to disassociate oneself from a charitable organization due to a tarnished resume of one of the co-volunteers is unheard of. It is not and should not be a measure to restrict anyone to provide voluntary service contribution in any organization. It is shameful that Senator McCain has decided to drag himself into such despicable character assassination of Senator Obama by sending “robo” call and fliers to voters with such a message, for political advantage. To my great surprise, Gov. Sarah Palin is against the idea. On October 20, 2008 during a candid interview with reporters traveling with her she said, “If I had my way, the McCain campaign and the Republican National Committee would not be flooding battleground states with automated phone calls tying Barack Obama to former radical William Ayers, as they have done over the last week”.
If the standard of which Senator McCain wishes his opponent to be judged is valid, it should apply to him as well. Based on his line of thinking, it can be said that his continued relationship with a convicted domestic terrorist Gordon Liddy reflects his judgment and character. How comfortable would a voter feel in voting for a presidential candidate who has a friendly relationship with a felon who committed the most catastrophic political wrong doing in the history of this nation and which led to impeachment/ resignation of a former president? How can one be a head of a government of which his friend (Liddy) would rather see some of its agents killed? One can understand the need of McCain to appease the Gordon’s talk-show audience but as leader, McCain should be embarrassed for such a relationship. This subject deserves a detailed review by the media. To an independent voter driven by judgment rather than passion, a continued association with an unrepentant Watergate kingpin is a show-stopper for any candidate’s ascendancy into the highest office in the land.
CNN, Washington Post, New York Times, The Chicago Sun, The New Yorker and The New Republic News, among others have made independent reviews of the Obama-Ayers relationship and found nothing. How come independent reviews have never been conducted relative to the McCain-Liddy relationship? In addition, why has Senator McCain’s not been aggressively questioned on his biased narrow-minded McCarthyism thinking? Why has Senator McCain not been asked about the relationship of Todd Palin with the secessionist Alaska Independent Party? This is a double standard, journalistic failure or an abrogation of responsibility by the US main media. It is important that Americans voters be provided with the relevant information before the Election Day.