News
Swiss Residents Argue Events in Gaza, Israel
February 25, 2009 - 12:00am(GENEVA) — Like Cornell, Switzerland is populated with students from all sorts of backgrounds, ethnicities and religions; students who collaborate with one another on a daily basis and foster constructive dialogue on many subjects. With strong ties to the international community, however, Cornell is not immune to conflict, as is evident in the ongoing controversy and recent debates related to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.
Though Switzerland is renowned for being a bastion for open discussion and tolerance, it has recently witnessed numerous demonstrations concerning global economic equality, lack of aid to war-torn countries and Israel’s response to the rockets that were launched by Hamas into Israel.
Many Swiss residents were angered by the intensity of Israel’s actions, saying Israel was not justified in making such a disproportionately aggressive response. According to Marion Aporta, an intern at the International Labour Organization raised in Geneva, Switzerland, many Swiss citizens developed this perception by comparing the number of Israeli victims of the Hamas attacks to the Palestinian victims of the Israeli response.
Aporta said that discussing the Israeli-Palestinian conflict is difficult for many Swiss residents because some examine the entire history of it, starting with Israel’s creation in 1948 and others isolate this most recent escalation in violence. Many Swiss people argue over whether Israel has the right to employ aggressive military action on the grounds that it has been persecuted in the past.
“I don’t think it’s a good argument [to say that Israel is justified in their actions] because we can’t compare number of victims now to those in the past. If we constantly keep going back, then there’s no limit. Each situation has specific circumstances that make it different,” Aporta said.
While Hamas violated the cease fire in December, many people in Switzerland came out to protest against Israel’s defensive measures. According to the Associated Press, Israel’s 22-day offensive in Gaza to stop Hamas rocket fire into Israel left more than 1,330 Palestinians dead and caused significant destruction in the strip. Of these deaths, 580 were members of Hamas or other militant groups. By comparison, Israel claimed it lost 10 soldiers and three civilians by the time Hamas announced a cease-fire on Jan. 18.
Despite the pro-Palestinian tilt, some Swiss residents feel that both sides have too much blood on their hands and cannot be fully absolved of their actions, regardless of any justification they may have for their actions.
One intern working at the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees said, “The two sides of the conflict point fingers but fail to realize that they have more in common with one another than they’d like to acknowledge.”
Additionally, many Swiss people are angered by more than just the recent Israeli rocket attacks into Gaza. They disagreed with the Israel-imposed sanctions on Gaza last year as well as the alleged use of illegal weapons such as white phosphorous bombs.
The U.N. has criticized Israel’s use of sanctions in Gaza in the past, namely because of Israel’s block of fuel and food from entering into the territory.
Aporta said, “Swiss people want the embargos to stop. It’s not just the war [they are upset about]. It’s that the people in Gaza are essentially in a jail and lots of people here want Palestine to be its own separate state but with a better government.”
The intern working at the UNHCR agreed, saying, “I am a bit disappointed that the Israelis don’t have more compassion towards the people they have displaced.”
The UNHCR intern also stated that many Swiss people are against Israel because it is supported by America. While the anti-American sentiment is subdued compared to other parts of Europe, the feeling is still there. The intern indicated that some Swiss people see America as too domineering.
But not all people living in Switzerland express pro-Palestinian sentiment. Ludovic Labbé, who is originally from France and now resides in Geneva, voiced a position more in favor of Israel.
“I am more pro-Israeli because I think they are the main group trying to achieve peace and trying to get along [with the Palestinians],” Labbé said. “Israel has the right to protect itself. If France dropped bombs on Switzerland, then the Swiss have the right to defend themselves by whatever means necessary.”
One Swiss woman believed that Israel had the right to defend herself in this situation, but that Israelis should be more careful in avoiding hitting civilian populations. Israel has accused Hamas of using human shields, claiming that this was an intentional effort by Hamas to make it more difficult for the Israeli army to avoid civilians.
Another intern at the World Health Organization, originally from Uzbekistan, who wished to remain anonymous, observed little conflict when she was studying in Israel last year, very close to the Gaza strip.
Having lived in the area for a year, she was able to interact frequently with both Palestinians and Israelis. She remembers one encounter very vividly with a Palestinian cab driver. She said that the cab driver wanted his children to go school in Israel because there is no infrastructure or education in Gaza.
She explained that the lack of education in the area contributes to a climate that is conducive to violence and social unrest.
“Without Israel, Palestine would be nothing,” she said.
Even though Switzerland has tried to shy away from the conflict in the past, with large populations of Arabic, Israeli and Jewish people, conflict and tensions between Swiss residents was almost inevitable.
However, Aporta said, “For the most part, people get along here all the time. Rarely ever do you see problems rise.”

Hamas violated its ceasefire?...Hardly.
Hamas violated its ceasefire?...Hardly.
It was Israel who officially broke the ceasefire on Nov. 4 by laundhing an incursion in to Gaza. The figure of 580 Hamas people is also a very dubious claim to make.
I am surprised that such blatant lies can be published in the Sun. This is really pathetic.
Article Errors
The Sun really needs to do its homework. Blaming Hamas for superficially breaking the ceasefire ignores the continuous incursions and targeted attacks the Israeli military conducted during the duration of the ceasefire. A ceasefire literally means "stopping fire." Israeli forces obviously play by their own rules.
And also, please disclose this ridiculous "580 Hamas militants" died in the attacks. Are you serious? I have not seen a single source attempt to quantify the number of Hamas dead. This is a real shame for the Sun to allow this type of writing.
Article Errors
"And also, please disclose this ridiculous "580 Hamas militants" died in the attacks. Are you serious? I have not seen a single source attempt to quantify the number of Hamas dead."
I don't know what you've been reading, but there have been numerous numbers thrown left and right attempting 'to quantify the number of Hamas dead,' including the Palestinian Ministry of Health, the PCHR, as well as the CLA, which is where the number of Hamas dead was quantified at 580. Although this number is coming from an Israeli source, (http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1233304788684&pagename=JPost%...), I don't think that you should categorize this claim as a 'blatant lie,' since the PCHR puts the number of Hamas combatant casualties at 223 (still a respectable amount) (http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2009/01/22/world/main4746224.shtml?source...).
Furthermore, the main point of that paragraph was to simply point out the disproportionate number of Israeli to Palestinian deaths during the most recent Israeli incursion into the Gaza strip. I don't think comparing 1330 Palestinian casualties, including 570 combatant deaths, to a mere 13 Israeli casualties, would seem any less disproportionate if you replaced the number 570 with 223: a lot more Palestinian civilians died, that's all the article is trying to say. We can all agree that none of the number of casualties are correct, and they're most likely inflated or deflated based on bias, but they're out there, and criticizing this article for choosing one number of casualties over another would validate criticizing the UN's decision to accept the number of casualties recorded by Palestinian Ministry of Health. There's a great article that talks about this:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/7855070.stm
"Blaming Hamas for superficially breaking the ceasefire ignores the continuous incursions and targeted attacks the Israeli military conducted during the duration of the ceasefire. A ceasefire literally means "stopping fire." Israeli forces obviously play by their own rules."
I agree with you, however, you're also forgetting that 20 rockets and 18 mortars were fired into Israel from Gaza.
(http://www.mfa.gov.il/MFA/Terrorism-+Obstacle+to+Peace/Palestinian+terro...)
(http://www.hrw.org/en/news/2008/11/20/letter-hamas-stop-rocket-attacks)
Does this not mean that Hamas itself did not 'stop fire' judging by your very own definition of the term 'ceasefire'? I'm not trying to attack your claim, but this issue is far too complex to not include this sort of information.
Regardless of whether these sources are coming from a pro-Israeli or pro-Palestinian organizations, there's no point in beginning a full blown argument here, especially since this article wants to simply show the Swiss perspective and reaction to the most recent Israeli-Hamas conflict.
proportionality
I always find it laughable when articles like this mention in one sentence "large numbers of Arabs, Israelis and Jews..."
Many love to forget that most all non-Jewish Palestinians also consider themselves Arabs.
There are 21 Arab states, including giant Egypt, which can open its Gaza border any time to save and absorb Gazans, just as Israel absorbed a million Jews kicked from Arab states. Many ignore Egypt's decades-long Gaza siege. Such ignorance is apparently politically correct.
300 million Arabs, 13 million Jews.
All Israel, including Judea and Samaria (the "West Bank"), is under 1/10th of 1% of the Mideast.
All Jews worldwide are under 1/6 of 1% of world population. So if all Jews were killed it would be the loss of a "mere" drop in the bucket of humanity.
About 80% of Palestine is in the state known as Jordan, a nation of 85% Palestinians ruled by a British-installed Bedouin minority monarchy.
Many love to ignore these clear facts of the big picture regarding proportionality, just as they ignore Hamas' declared goal to destroy Israel.