News
Skorton Quells Concerns About Workforce Reduction in Open Forum
March 22, 2009 - 11:00pmThis story was originally published on March 16.
Addressing Cornell’s approximately $230 million deficit, President David Skorton summarized the University’s current financial situation and answered pointed questions from an audience of at least 200 this afternoon in an open forum aimed for faculty and staff in Statler Auditorium.
Most of the questions raised were centered on the subject of workforce reduction. Skorton said several times during the question-and-answer session that there would be more layoffs in the future.
“It’s not possible to reduce the budget of the institution — that is predominantly based on workforce with 65 percent of the budget — without getting some workforce reduction. It’s not possible. But it is possible to do it [in a respectful and humane way,]” Skorton said.
The University has laid-off 35 employees so far in the current fiscal year, according to Mary Opperman, vice president for human resources. This, however, is not the ultimate number as budget information is not finalized yet. Opperman also implied that not all layoffs were due to budget cuts and the number has to be put in context.
“Remember we have layoffs every year because of research activities,” she said.
Although workforce reduction is inevitable, Skorton emphasized that it is always a last-resort, and will be conducted in a respectful manner.
“[We are] trying to find a way that reduction in workforce … [will be] done respectful of the situation people are in. Both financially respectful and [in a] personal, human respectful [way,]” Skorton said.
While departments are required to reduce budgets, Skorton stressed that they are also asked to retain faculty and staff. In the case of layoffs, the recommendations would originate from a local level in individual departments and units, then channel into a single process and review at the University level.
No particular profile type, such as age group, is being targeted for layoffs, according to Opperman.
“We do not target individuals. We target work that is going to end,” Opperman said. She added that all health and retirement benefit would stay in place.
The University has also saved about $20 million from not issuing raises this year. Freezing salaries, however, is not a sustainable solution, according to Skorton.
When asked whether the construction pause would result in the firing of related staff, Skorton said that he could not provide an answer until the end of the semester. The pause would provide time for the University to re-consider all construction projects.
“We need time to think this through a little bit … We can’t tell you what will go forward until the end of this semester,” Skorton said.
The forum began with Skorton outlining Cornell's current financial state: 11 percent of the University's and 13 percent of the Ithaca campus' operating budget is funded by the endowment, which saw an approximately $80 million reduction.
As a result of the deficits — $215 million in the Ithaca campus; $230 million University-wide — the University will reduce the endowment payout rate by 15 percent this year, and about 11 percent the year after. A $50 million budget reduction will also be implemented across campus this July, and another $50 million budget correction will take effect in July 2010.
“This first round of cuts has not been done strategically … in the sense that the cuts were done across all units. Everybody got a five percent cut, except the provost and I got twice the cuts in our own units. Once we decided that, planning ahead for 2010-11, we need to do that in a strategic way, not in the across-the-board way we’re doing right now,” Skorton said.
The University will also increase its liquidity, or working capital, by two methods: invest the endowment in ways that make money more quickly available, and sell $500 million worth of taxable bonds. Skorton said that the first strategy is quite successful so far; and Cornell is in the process of talking with bond-rating agencies.
Apart from the endowment, Cornell's revenue also heavily depends on three other sources: tuition, funding for scientific research, and revenue from the Weill Medical School's medical care services. Skorton said that those revenue sources are “all very robust” and are not directly affected by the current market conditions.
“I think [the open forum] is a very positive thing. I think the president is doing the best job he can do,” said an administrative assistant who wishes to remain anonymous. “[In this financial situation] it would be strange not to worry about your job.”
Several other University employees who attended the forum refused to comment.
The forum was held over Spring Break in hopes that more employees would have the opportunity to attend, according to Tommy Bruce, vice president for University communications.

I was laid off after more
I was laid off after more than 25 years, and I am devastated. We could lose our home, our vehicles, everything
Please do not publically say who this is from; if there is ever a chance of getting back into Cornell, I do not want to make waves.
Cornell did not explore alternatives to layoffs
No unique alternatives were explored to avert this tragedy for many. Such a big university with so many clever minds always trying to think of unique solutions for OTHERS but not themselves when it comes to attempting to solve the suffering of long time, loyal employees. Shame on Cornell for not using their best minds on this to inspire alternative methods to massive layoffs. Before you lob the layoff bomb of mass family destruction, tell the truth to divisions, ASK what employees would like to do as a unit, (willing to sacrifice), VOLUNTEER sacrifices to prevent layoffs. Sacrifices, cuts, vacations with no pay, half days 3/4 days. 4 day work weeks that save massive amounts of energy with a 3 day weekend (other universities have already successfully done this), or stagger the days off if you are a department who always needs someone there, like the vet school. Or if your that desperate ask how many would accept a 4 day work week pay amount and not their normal 5 day pay, I would have taken that offer. Many were not that "poor" and would have liked the TIME. Now they ARE poor due to layoffs.
All those brilliant minds and not a creative solution from any of them, they are no different than the low level industries they turn their noses up at. Like sheep, just following what the rest of the world is doing. So much for great minds here. Cornell employees discussed more clever innovative solutions among themselves than CU's high level, high educated decision makers.
The gallows fell in mass recently, so now with many out of work, the Tompkins and surrounding County businesses, housing markets, and everything will suffer along with those jobless employees. Like a domino effect compounding the problem and resulting in even more layoffs. Lack of innovative thought by Cornell in the last year that they knew they had a brewing problem, and too late for most of us, you've ruined our lives already.
Cornell University, so good at helping "the world," so bad at handling what's in our own CU family.