News

Lawyer Tracks Development of Domestic Violence Act in India

March 24, 2009 - 11:00pm
By Michelle Winglee

Asmita Basu, a guest speaker from New Delhi, addressed a crowd of mostly graduate students at Myron Taylor Hall about the obstacles and successes in implementing India’s Domestic Violence Act at a midday lecture yesterday.

Basu is a fundamental contributor in the enactment of the Domestic Violence Act in 2005 as a project coordinator of the Lawyers Collective Women’s Rights Initiative, a top legal, non-government organization dedicated to empowering women through law. She spoke in a filled lecture room of around 50 people about her experience in India drafting the law, lobbying members of Parliament to form consensus over the content of the domestic violence law, and monitoring its implementation.

Basu first described the pre-existing void of effective domestic violence legal actions — which only pertained to married women — and the serious need to empower the women of India who face gender inequalities arising from traditional cultural stigmas.

Basu also noted the shortcomings of previous laws regarding cruelty within marriage and dowry as a precondition to marriage. Criminal law would provide “penalization without any scope for reliefs,” she said. Under civil law, Basu explained that victims faced difficulty in proving cruelty, and she emphasized that it took a long time for a husband and wife to reach any sort of agreement.

“It is hard to get a fair settlement,” Basu added, especially as “religious law is discriminatory towards women.”

Changing the law: Asmita Basu, who helped to enact the Domestic Violence Act in India, speaks yesterday in Myron Taylor Hall.Changing the law: Asmita Basu, who helped to enact the Domestic Violence Act in India, speaks yesterday in Myron Taylor Hall.

The Domestic Violence Act, brought into force by the Indian government in 2006, would include all women in domestic relations, give them the right to reside in a shared household regardless of who held the title to the house, enlist the services of protection officers to assist the abused and prevent any form of forced reconciliation. Furthermore, the Act, meant to work in conjunction with the existing laws, would allow more domestic violence cases to be tried as criminal cases, thereby expediting court procedures.

While Basu humbly remarked that the passing of the Act was “just one small step towards equality,” she also emphasized that the key aspect of the Act is that it enabled more immediate action.

“Sometimes non-implementation is written into the law,” Basu said. “The idea was to get the reliefs fast.”

Basu pointed out that the Act helped to prevent forced marriages and assist recent widows from being evicted.

The Parliament passed 90 percent of the proposal, but it declined to implement a system that would monitor the implementation of the Act. As a result, Basu and a group of lawyers performed the follow-up work themselves.

“Collecting data was a major obstacle,” she said.

The main difficulty, Basu explained, was the lack of records for when the Domestic Violence Act was used in courts. She also noted that as lawyers they did not have the methodology of data collecting that social scientists might have had.

“It was hard to identify conclusive trends,” Basu admitted.

Despite these hardships, Basu and her team observed an increase in the number of cases for domestic violence. In some cities, such as New Dehli, the number of filings rose by three times.

While Basu acknowledged the inability to draw a direct link from their findings to the newly implemented Act, she suggested that it indicates a higher level of awareness for domestic violence.

In the future Basu hopes that the government will play a larger role in monitoring the law.

“It’s the state responsibility to review the law … we can’t let the government off the hook,” she said.

Ameya Balsekar grad said that he enjoyed the lecture.

“It was really good and I think it’s an important topic … You hear a lot about domestic violence on a daily basis. so it’s really great to hear that there are people working on issues like this.”

Arrangements for Basu’s presentation at Cornell were made by the Berger International Legal Studies Speaker Series in conjunction with the International Human Rights Clinic.


Related Topics: domestic violence, india, law, lecture

DV act in India being abused and is gender biased

DV act is a badly drafted law in India, as observed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India too. The act is gender biased, and assumes that only a man can be perpetuator of the domestic violence. In reality, women are no GOD themselves. This act along with 498A is increasingly being used by urban woman to harass the husband and in-laws, to extort money, as relationship sours. Some of the clauses of the DV act can out rightly be condemned and the act simply does away with the fundamental principal of judiciary - that the accused has the right to defend himself. The act clearly states that the mere statement of the woman is more than sufficient to establish domestic violence and the act assumes that woman never tell lies!!!. The DV act should be made gender-neutral and both sides should be made to prove or dis-prove there contention.

Equality

“just one small step towards equality,”

There is no such thing as 'EQUALITY' in the DV Act.

It is solely to avenge the males and their family for the atrocities commited by some mentaly and emotionaly sick people during the past centuries. DV Act is the last straw in dsintegrating the Indian Culture, Indian Families, The Indian People and India. No Invasion is required, a foreign government can just walk in and by the government and rule.

Domestic Violence law is wrong, open challenge.

Our NGO gives open challenge to anyone who can say on live debate that this Domestic Violence Law is correct.

• Why women do not have to sign at any place in this Law?

• Why through old people out of own earned houses, under section 19 of this Law?

• Why unlimited compensation, from all relatives and friends of husband, including from married sisters, mother-in-laws, retired father-in-laws?

• Why neutral social service NGO's can not be service provider or protection officer, why only biased persons be protection officers and service providers?

• Why multiple maintenance cases by this law? Why is maintenance Law not gender neutral.

When Delhi High court Judge says this Law is a recipe for social disaster, or Supreme court Judgment says the law interpretation can lead to chaos in society, is absurd, why the NCW, WCD ministry and lakhs of paid persons who get money to do one sided research, tell one-sided things in public and press (like radical feminists), do not listen.

See the plight of victims of PWDVA "protection of women from domestic Violence Act Law". Review this Law and transfer those in NCW(National commission for women), responsible for drafting this wrong Law.

Thanking you,

Yours Sincerely,

Sandeep Bhartia (9971117829)

President (Gender Human Rights Society (Regd.))

www.ghrs.in

Contact: Sandeep (9971117829),

Indian DV law is horribly drafted

The Dometic Violence is so draconian that it cannot possibly reduce any violence. The courts have come and said that it is a badly crafted law. The ambit is wide and the scope of the law is so broad and vague that any woman can apply it for their benefit even if she had a boyfriend - girlfriend relationship 10-15 years (there is no time bar) after their relationship ended.

For more look at the interview of the Minister for Women and Child Development, Govt. of India, here:

Part 1:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=in_4QhWQaq4

Part 2:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sk-RCM8b3oQ

Part 3:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RRDg-IXF3pU

The trouble doesn't end here. Badly crafted and biased law (what about men being abused??) in the hands of corrupt police, inept judiciary and greedy lawyers means another money making machine for the Bureaucrats-police-lawyer nexus.

The richer the husband the more lucrative the business is.

DV Act is being grossly

DV Act is being grossly misused by following sections of Indian Society :

a)Laweyrs who make living out of turning happy homes into feuding homes

b)Greedy women who see it as opportunity to make quick bucks out of these two laws - 498a & DV Act

Women in India are not that oppressed as the rest of world would like to think

We have largest women workforce in the world - higher than US & China

Educated women are ambitious & financially independent - this can be verified by reading profiles of over 10 million women seeking husbands at following matrimony sites :

www.bharatmatrimony.com

www.shaadi.com

www.jeevansaathi.com

Laweyrs want us to live in this myth that India is a land of snake charmers where women are treated cruelly, however, it is just as true as saying that every german is a nazi or every jew is killer of Jesus

F L a w.

http://www.expressindia.com/latest-news/False-dowry-case-Man-kills-self/...

They will need more of like this stories to come out of room of 50 people and understand the TRUTH.

God bless MEN.