News
C.U. Minorities Stage Mock Funeral, Ask for Greater Univ. Support
April 2, 2009 - 11:00pmAn uncharacteristic silence swept over Ho Plaza at 12:20 p.m. yesterday as approximately 15 students dressed in all black marched to a podium in front of Willard Straight Hall carrying a casket and a sign that said “RIP Safe Spaces at Cornell.” As a “coalition of concerned students,” these students marched through the Arts Quad to Ho Plaza in a mock funeral procession for Ujamaa, the Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender Resource Center, the Asian and Asian American Center, Akwe:kon and the Latino Living Center. The procession stopped in Ho Plaza for students to read eulogies for the program houses and resource centers, where it was joined by more students, faculty, staff and onlookers, before processing to Day Hall.
The funeral symbolized the “impending consequences of inaction” if the University continues its “policies and attitudes” that lead to the “... marginalization of these spaces” and the “conditions for them to be degraded and disregarded,” according to a program titled “A Funeral for Safe Spaces,” which was handed out during the procession and the eulogies.
Underrepresented: Students march from Ho Plaza to Day Hall yesterday to protest the potential closing of the minority housing on campus.
“The whole funeral was to serve as a catalyst. We just wanted to spark the conversation because no one has taken the decline of program houses seriously,” said Olivia Tai ’10, president of Mosaic, which is “a social support group that caters to the issues of queer and same-gender-loving people of color and allies,” according to the Student Activities website.
Cornell students have brought multiculturalism to the attention of Cornell administrators throughout its history, from the Straight Takeover in 1969, which spurred the creation of the Africana Center and Ujamaa, followed by a second major student uprising in 1993 that created the LLC, Kevin Cheng ’10 said in introduction to the eulogies. The ringing of a gong in between each speech punctuated the speakers’ eulogies.
“Program houses and safe spaces are the pillars of support for oppressed groups. If you remove the pillars, then the foundation will fall,” Cheng said.
In her eulogy for Ujamaa, Gabrielle Boley ’09 stated, “Ujamaa operated under the concept that we bring together all of our unique strengths to build up the community, charging us to a higher standard of operation, professionalism and awareness. But, the University neglected Ujamaa in the face of constant attacks ...”
The LGBT RC, which began this year with three permanent positions that have now been reduced to one, was eulogized by Jen Inloes ’09.
“... Under the guise of financial difficulties, the Office of the Dean of Students in 2009 decimated [the LGBT RC’s] services by placing the burden of supporting Cornell’s entire LGBT community on one individual,” Inloes said.
“Although the movement to establish the Center has been at least a decade long, the A3C was only established just recently in 2009. But, the A3C was under attack even before its creation,” Jonathan Pomboza ’10 said in reference to the Asian and Asian American Center, which was recently assigned an interim location and dean.
“... Akew:kon suffered from the same racist attitudes that plagued the other program houses, which even led to bias-related attacks,” Pomboza added.
The eulogies were rounded out by Tia Hicks ’11, who read a eulogy for the LLC.
“... The University failed to really provide solid support in the face of constant attacks and budget cuts, and in 2009, the Latino Living Center became no more. Rest in peace, Latino Living Center, 1994-2009,” Hicks said.
The purpose of the funeral was to draw attention to the vulnerability of these resources.
“Diversity is pointless if minorities are not equally represented at institutions that claim to be ‘forward thinking.’ How can equality be achieved if these oppressed groups are not proportionately represented according to their population in broader society? Furthermore, we reject a university that refuses to acknowledge the root of the problem — institutionalized oppression,” Zachary Murray ’11 read in closing, before students walked to Day Hall.
“I felt like it was successful, Hicks said. “We got a lot of attention. I think [the administration] need[s] to listen to us and hear our concerns.”
At Day Hall, students passed out a petition to gain administrative support and attention, where they were joined by Catherine Holmes, associate dean of students for student activities, and Susan Murphy ’73, vice president for student and academic services.
“I understand that they’re saying this is symbolic and I certainly respect that ... None of these programs are in jeopardy. Are they right that we need to be vigilant? I agree with them whole heartedly,” Murphy said.
Last Friday, in a meeting with The Sun, President David J. Skorton announced an upcoming review of the program houses.
“I think we should let things play out and see and act in terms of [students] preferences. In addition to that I think everything here should be periodically reviewed ... I’m big on periodic review ... There is a review coming up on the program houses,” Skorton said.
Like Murphy, Skorton affirmed his support for the program houses.
“I’ve been vocally supportive of program houses both here and at other institutions. But largely under the claim that students choose them and are not opposed ... And there is absolutely no plan on my part to savage the program houses or do anything like that,” Skorton said.
However, when the procession ended, students expressed that the administration still needs to step up.
“The administration is using the financial crisis as a guise ... It is our opinion that the administration still treats these places as a concession. You can’t say there is diversity at Cornell when there aren’t places like the [resource centers],” Cheng said.
Similarly, Inloes expressed a desire to see more action.
“President Skorton keeps paying lip service to the importance of financial aid, but has not made any public statement about the University’s commitment to diversity and diversity support services during the economic crisis,” Inloes said. “I’m hoping to push the University for some kind of statement.”
A plain-clothed member of the Cornell Police followed the procession and refused questions.

haha i love the last
haha i love the last sentence!
props to the organizers and participants of this mock funeral. hopefully administrators will take diversity seriously instead of constantly consolidating positions and slashing services and funds. it makes no economic sense since diversity initiatives cost so little in the overall spending of cornell, but they serve so many people, as well as the larger cornell population.
Amazing
Amazing event. I think the Skorton should address the specific concerns of these students, such as cutting the employees of the LGBTQ Center from 3 to 1 and cutting funding to important programs, rather than making general statements about his so called commitment to diversity. We do not want lip service, we want real promises. And if the university is so commited to students of color on campus why is there is no A3C? Also, program housing is part of the rich history of Cornell. Does Telluride House come up for review? Does the hockey team? What about Skortons salary? When we do we as a student body get to review that?
Amazing Indeed.
First to comment on whether the "Telluride House come up for review? Does the hockey team?..."
--> "The Telluride Association is a non-profit organization in the United States that provides young people with free educational programs emphasizing intellectual curiosity, democratic self-governance, and social responsibility." (Wikipedia) It has nothing to do with race/cultural background/gender/sexual preference/religious affiliation.
--> The hockey team is a sports team that has nothing to do with race/cultural background/gender/sexual preference/religious affiliation..
--> Skorton's salary has nothing to do with his race/cultural background/gender/sexual preference/religious affiliation.
The event is "Amazing" because it's unfortunate that students on this campus feel disenfranchised. I am sorry to think you feel that way, and I wish I knew who had personally harmed you and your community so as to defend your honor; until I and the rest of the Cornell community have evidence of discrimination, how can we feel for your sense of alienation?
I question you now though, on whether would you think it appropriate to have this program house: M.WASP, for male white anglo-saxon protestants? or or or better yet, a program house for every single Cornell ethnic organization on campus? Considering the first group always gets looked over due to Affirmative Action, and the others are small communities, they clearly need a safe haven from the oppression of their peers.
Also, there exists the Multicultural Greek Letter Council in which there are fraternities/sororities for all of the ethnicities of the program houses sans Native American.
What can you not accomplish in a Club/Organization like most other ethnicities/small communities on campus?
I think program houses were important in the past. But things change, and society norms change. You're looking at a Cornell Community who accepts and encourages unity. Why do you think the community here is out to get you? If we're supposed to be one big red community that encompasses Cornell, self-segregation hinders the ability to unite. Self-segregation is a step backwards, not forwards for acceptance.
The university never shuts
The university never shuts up about diversity. Are there places on campus that are NOT safe for minorities or those who are not straight? These programs encourage self-segregation. The point of diversity is that everyone mixes together and learns new things from each other. Letting all the Native Americans live in the same house, for example, is completely counter intuitive to this end. Having a center for a particular ethnic group once again discourages people from leaving their comfort zone and joining the melting pot that is the United States of America.
“Diversity is pointless if
“Diversity is pointless if minorities are not equally represented at institutions that claim to be ‘forward thinking.’ How can equality be achieved if these oppressed groups are not proportionately represented according to their population in broader society? Furthermore, we reject a university that refuses to acknowledge the root of the problem — institutionalized oppression,” Zachary Murray ’11 read in closing, before students walked to Day Hall.
Institutionalized oppression? We attend one of the most liberal schools in the country in one of the most liberal towns in the country. Please tell me how you have been oppressed. You don't get your own center, does that mean you are oppressed? All the university talks about is diversity. I hear more about diversity programs than academic programs!
If we wanted to have minorities proportionately represented according to their population in broader society (say, the USA), we would have to get more Hispanic students and remove a lot of African American and Jewish students (they make up a surprisingly low percentage of the US population).
end segregation now
It's 2009. Isn't it time for our great Ivy League land grant university - the most open Ivy, the most democratic Ivy, the first to be co-ed - to be desegregated?
Wow, I can't even comprehend
Wow, I can't even comprehend the hardships the minorities on campus face. Affirmative action is not enough, it's easy to see why they need to parade around campus with overdramatic presentations promoting their self-segregation (from which more complaints about exclusion usually arise).
Relax, the sky isn't falling. The world isn't out to get you, but it doesn't owe you anything, either. This persistent whining is nothing more than an annoyance to those who have to deal with it.
What's up with all the white
What's up with all the white kids in the photo, don't we have any minorities that care about this?
Seriously, as you say we are in these harsh financial times, so maybe we should make sure that every student that needs financial aid gets financial aid instead of getting a resource center for homosexuals to talk about their feelings.
For me, personally, that should take a priority. Also, making sure professors aren't fired and that their pensions are secured. But most importantly my financial aid seems a lot more important than some cock and bull "resource centers" for minorities which end up being underused by the same minorities and their white "allies" that requested them in the first place.