Opinion

Taking Root

August 25, 2008 - 11:00pm
By Sanjiv Tata

Cornell’s campus is picture perfect: bright blue skies dotted with fluffy white clouds, panoramic views of crystalline lakes, the clarion tones of bell chimes, and the cacophony of new students. If this sounds like it was penned by a sentimental senior, you are right.

Orientation Week reminds me of what is best about Cornell.

Cornell is quintessentially a village. And, at its very heart is the campus residential system, which crucially shapes the college experience of freshmen and transfers alike. So as the new arrivals start to settle in, it is especially appropriate to consider the importance of their living arrangements.

The freshman experience is defined by a physical reality: all freshmen live together in a place especially reserved for them — North Campus. This unique microenvironment provides freshmen the crucial opportunity to bond together as a cohesive group while they make the difficult transition from high school to college. The residences on North Campus are in a very real sense incubators — nurturing freshmen and allowing them to mature. Surprisingly, dedicating a special area of campus for freshman accommodation is a relatively new innovation for Cornell. It was only in 2001 that North Campus was transformed into a freshman zone. Let’s hope that living on North Campus evolves into a cherished tradition for Cornell freshmen.

Of course, not all Cornell freshman traditions are worthy of respect. For example, there used to be a tradition that all male freshmen would have to wear a beanie in public at all times — a “dress code” that was rigorously enforced by zealous sophomores. Only late in the spring semester were freshmen allowed to be seen in public without their beanies. This dispensation triggered a remarkable rite of spring — the Mud Rush, a boisterous event at which freshmen, against the protests of sophomores, tossed their beanies into a huge bonfire. Fortunately, this silly tradition has long since been consigned to oblivion.

Speaking of eradicating certain Cornell traditions reminds me of the controversial decision made two years ago to tear down, and not replace, the venerable Class of ’17 Hall a.k.a. the Transfer Center. There were howls of protest. The Residential Student Congress and the Student Assembly passed angry resolutions deploring the decision and urging the establishment of a new home for transfer students. I confess that, as a member of the RSC, I supported those resolutions. In hindsight, I was wrong.

For many years, the transfer student experience was shaped by the fact that, like freshmen, all transfers lived together. In fact, the concept of having all transfers live together significantly pre-dated the idea of the North Campus residential initiative for freshmen. Despite being lumped with freshmen in most orientation activities, transfer students are a very different group. Freshmen have to face the challenge of crossing the threshold from high school to college. Transfers, by contrast, have already made this critical passage. For them, the challenge is to adjust to new surroundings and integrate as quickly as possible into the Cornell community.

With the advent of the West Campus house system, it is no longer obvious that a dedicated house just for transfers furthers the goal of rapid integration. The new approach that the administration has adopted involves placing small groups of transfer students together in the various West Campus houses. I think that this new policy has a lot of merit.

First, by placing transfer students in blocks, there is a sufficient critical mass in each house, so they do not feel isolated and out of place. They have the company of other transfers who are facing the same challenges. Thus a core advantage of the old transfer center is retained. Second, by spreading groups of transfer students among the various West Campus houses, the new students can interact and bond with other upperclassmen — an opportunity that would have been unavailable if they were isolated in a transfer center. There is, also, a unique advantage of seeding the West Campus houses with groups of transfer students — it could act as a catalyst to help the West Campus house system realize its potential.

It is fair to say that the West Campus houses, while seeking to emulate the house systems of Oxford, Cambridge, Harvard and Yale, have so far not achieved comparable success. The primary reason for this lack of success at Cornell is that the students who choose to live in these houses already have developed their own ties with other campus groups and communities. Transfer students, by contrast, are seeking a sense of community and are highly motivated to become involved on campus. They can serve as an activist core, drawing in other house residents, and transforming the houses into vibrant communities. I’ve got my fingers crossed that a new transfer tradition will take root.

Sanjiv Tata is a senior in the College of Arts and Sciences. He can be reached at sjt36@cornell.edu The Vested Interest will appear alternate Tuesdays this semester.



Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Cross-sectional houses support diversity

"the new students can interact and bond with other upperclassmen — an opportunity that would have been unavailable if they were isolated in a transfer center"

This is an important observation, and it highlights one of the most important benefits of house systems and residential college systems like the one being established at Cornell. These units are cross-sectional, and so bring students into contact with other people who have different interests and experiences. They support diversity; they don't segregate students the way theme halls do.

Sanjev, This is an

Sanjev,

This is an absolutely wonderful critique of one of the successes of the House system.

I was too a transfer student at one point, almost to Cornell. One of the highlights of Cornell that attracted me was the support offered to transfer students via the Transfer Center. Although I chose to transfer elsewhere during my first couple of years here as a Ph.D. candidate, I watched the restructuring of transfer oriented housing options with some concern. Obviously the movement of transfers to the graduate community of Hasbrouck was the biggest concern, but I was also worried that transfer students might find themselves lost without a “home”.

After spending a year living/working on West, I know that your analysis is spot on. First off, the House system has provided transfers with more support than the old system. As you mentioned there is both a network of new, fellow transfers, as well as plenty of seasoned Cornellians to create bonds with. In addition West provides several levels of mentorship, cascading from numerous faculty participants, the live-in Graduate Resident Fellows, and upper level Cornell students. This mentorship serves to benefit all students, but is certainly helpful to transfer students who are making a big transition. Finally I’ve watched several transfers become strong community leaders on west in many different ways, and am too impressed with how they bring their fellow housemates together. West Campus is certainly benefiting the transfer experience, and the transfers are benefiting the West Campus community.

Mike Walsh

Former Bethe House Graduate Resident Fellow

Student-Elected Trustee

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.