Opinion

Hey There, Sister

November 13, 2008 - 12:00am
By Katie Engelhart

“Nice shoes. Wanna fuck?” A stranger greets me on a Collegetown street corner. I grimace and keep walking. Suddenly, a second unfamiliar male — an accomplice to the first — leaps out from the shadows. Whipping out a digital camera, he captures my disgust before the two run away into the night. On the phone with my sister, I stare after them in dismay.

But something about having my little sister as an aural witness to the transgression got me all hot and bothered. So, when I saw the little assholes run into Collegetown Pizza, I decided I needed to give her a lesson in self-assertiveness.

Mustering all the maturity and poise I had in me, I stomped across the street to articulate my grave sense of grievance.

“Hey, shitheads. Who do you think you are?”

And there, before my eyes, the despicable delinquents transformed into bumbling baby frat boys. In between bites of cheese pizza, they apologized profusely. The pernicious prank, they claimed, was not aimed at me personally. Rather, it was a test of their own commitment, set forth to them by the honorable leaders of their fraternity.

Harmless horseplay! Trivial tomfoolery!

I walked away smiling and said goodbye to my sister.

But by letting the blameworthy ‘bros’ off the hook, I lost the chance to really explain myself to her.

This week, my sassy sis, a freshman at another fine institution, will take her first steps toward sororitydom. She is on her way toward gaining admittance to her school’s “Greek” community … and therefore, to surrounding herself with company as fantastically frat-ilicious as the boys described above.

And it’s making me nervous to think that she could become a victim of this kind of blatant sexism.

But it’s not the boys I’m most worried about …

As a former “sister,” I want to take this time to give my sister some sisterly advice. At the same time, I’ll open up my message to the big sisters of the Cornell sisterhood: the Panhellenic Council.

Dear Sally (c/o: Panhellenic Council),

Once, I was in a sorority. Now I’m not. On a campus where men often ask me what house I’m in before they know my name, this is tantamount to blasphemy.

So why did I (shhh) deactivate? It certainly had nothing do with the girls — some of the best females I’ve met on campus to date. But it was a reaction to irreconcilable problems I had with the system … most of them having to do with the way I felt degraded and belittled by Greek life.

Political theorists would revel in a study of Cornell undergraduates. We are a group of diverse teenagers who arrive at a common locale with wide eyes and a hankerin’ for some hullabaloo.

Then, within a few months, we develop a taste for self-imposed isolation. We form homogenous mini-communities — tiny societies with their own elected leaders, legislatures, administrators, and legal systems.

[And don’t you look down on me — hipsters, athletes, science enthusiasts, … hotelies. You do it too, albeit in a more informal way.]

But the strangest thing is that, eventually, we start to accept these weird little self-imposed systems as given.

From day one of “rush week,” I was faced with a formidable task: trying my best to abide by the rules set forth by the formidable and omnipotent Panhellenic Council.

It seems strange to me that a group of chicks can be so paternalistic.

While my male friends were pounding beers and downing chicken wings with their potential bros, I spent recruitment week nibbling nervously on Panhellenic-approved cookies and being sure not to make reference to the three Bs: boys, booze, and bids. Clad in uncomfortable heels and squirming anxiously in my seat each time I was referred to as a “young lady,” I spent hours watching carefully rehearsed sorority skits and listened to sobbing seniors talk about how much their sisters mean to them.

I found myself using phrases like “girl friends” and saying things like “I heard third round of rush is when you really get a feel for the house.”

I’m not proud of it. But so it goes.

And the whole time, I was so preoccupied by how much it sucked that I forgot to ask why it sucked. I only learned later that it isn’t like this at other schools.

And the absurd rules just became more stringent once I joined. Bans on having parties. The mandatory presence of “house parents.” Financial fines for speaking out of turn.

This is all common knowledge to anyone “in a house,” but seems entirely nonsensical when taken out of context.

Flash back to junior year. I am sitting on the floor of a converted bedroom. It is the day of my trial. I skipped a required event and was being reprimanded.

Me: But I have a legitimate excuse. I was studying for the LSATs.

Unnamed Sorority: I understand that.

Me: So what’s the problem?

Unnamed Sorority: Katie, we have to fine you. It’s in the bylaws.

Me: [Pounding my first on the carpeted floor] THEN AMEND THE BYLAWS!

Much to my disappointment, the judicial council did not rally behind my clarion call for righteousness, lifting me up and proclaiming me the leader of a new revolutionary vanguard. Instead, I paid the $20 and went away sulking, the bitter taste of injustice still lingering in my mouth.

Why do we do this to ourselves?

As it stands, the system is archaic, paternalistic, and patronizing, imposing unnecessary restrictions on women old enough to handle themselves. It is demeaning for ‘Panhell’ to demand that freshman walk around in formal attire in the dead of winter so that they can look pretty for the hour they spend inside. It is degrading to make sophomores sing and dance around in a twisted attempt to attract freshmen with the best skit. It is an absurd expenditure of energy to deliver pre-approved cookies to sororities the morning of ‘final round’ to make sure that no house wins over a freshman girl with superior treats.

Don’t get wrong. I loves me some cookies. But there ain’t no chocolate chip cookie in the world that would have made me choose one house over another.

How unintelligent you must imagine me to be. How low you set the bar on my ability to make decisions.

The worst thing is that is all of this is only what occurred during normal business hours. It paled in comparison to the degrading situations the sorority system encourages its “young ladies” to enjoy during the off hours.

CEOs and Corporate Hoes.

Golf pros and Tennis Hoes.

Rock stars and Porn Stars.

Hoe down.

Sec’s and Execs.

Truckers ‘n’ Hookers.

Vikings and Virgins.

Snow pants or no pants.

‘Screw your sister.’

But I digress …

Nothing could convince me that Greek life is healthy for Cornell. Short of calling for its complete destruction, I’ll say only this: it’s high time to amend the bylaws.

Last Sunday, the Panhellenic Council had elections.

TO THE NEW PANHELLENIC COUNCIL — I ask you “young ladies” to think long and hard about the system as it stands. This is an opportunity to initiate a radical overhaul, a revamping of archaic rules that have little relevance to your group’s goals.

Frat boys do enough to degrade and demean us. Let’s stop doing it to ourselves.

TO SALLY — I ask that you consider carefully your decision to join. Also, Sal Pal, Dad told me about your biology exam and I’m very proud of you.

And, TO THOSE PRICKS FROM COLLEGETOWN PIZZA — Thank you for reminding me how thankful I am to have left a system that left me behind.

XO,

Katie

Katie Engelhart is a senior editor at The Sun. She can be reached at kengelhart@cornellsun.com. Don’t Kill The Messenger appears alternate Thursdays.


Related Topics: greek life, sex and sexuality

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

wonderful article.

wonderful article.

Excellent article. I

Excellent article. I couldn't agree more.

good article

i came across this only after reading the response to it by the exec vp elect of the ifc, which now makes his response seem a little ridiculous.

this was a really good article. what the future VP does not seem to acknowledge is that this isn't some kind of "bad seeds" thing, this is a systematic issue; a fraternity is encouraging, supporting and ritualizing this, its not just two asshole guys pranking someone.

thats an issue that needs to be addressed on a systematic level, not just by condoning the behavior of two specific people and acting as though they're acting independently.

as an ex sorority sister

as an ex sorority sister myself (and more importantly, a feminist), i enjoyed the article immensely. why do we allow men to degrade us in every way possible AND then degrade ourselves further? why do we allow things like girls gone wild? this society disgusts me sometimes. and it's not just cornell. every college i know of with a sorority system has the same crazy rules and fines. i know at my school we made up even more rules, including needing a hand written letter to the pres if we couldnt make a meeting. only time in my life email wasnt good enough. what a joke.

glad we both opted out.

Biggest Bunch of Bull I've Ever Read

Katie,

There are a lot of controversial issues with the greek system, but this article contains blatant lies - at least for the Cornell Greek System. Although I support the Greek system, I couldn't really argue with you if you talked about the possibility of alcohol abuse and I personally find it harmless - but I agree that one could definitely be offended by some of the mixer themes (even though they are intended to be in good fun and there are no dress requirements for any of these parties). You could also talk about how it separates you out from the rest of the undergraduate class or even say that it persuades women to think that shopping and boys are at the top of importance. But you don't discuss any of the actual controversy with the greek system. Instead - you choose to whine about your own experience in what seems like an attempt to just get your name out there perhaps have a published article to send along with your law school apps.

A sorority is a home for a lot of girls - finding 'sisters' on campus. It is a wonderful bonding experience for many. And from the article, it appears you just have issues with female bonding. Why do the words 'girl friends' bother you? And you were upset that you couldn't talk about alcohol and boys at rush? The whole idea is to let you find girls that you can be friends with, see yourself fitting in with at a higher level. But I suppose you need alcohol to be someone's friend? This is a constant theme in your article as you also take offense to party bans and house parents - both things set in place to keep alcohol abuse out of the sorority house itself.

As for the lies in the article - the rush skit is a source of class bonding. Sophomores are always so much closer to one another after practicing and performing and it is always in good fun and most everyone enjoys it. And if memory serves me right, you loved being in your sorority skit. Also - when it came to being fined for missing an event there are two things you failed to mention. First - you cannot be in any sort of club that doesn't have commitments. No one forced you to join - you opted to. You can't join the marching band and then skip the practices can you? The only mandatory sorority events are philanthropy and rush. You opting to get wasted on your weekends and not spend that time studying and then choosing to skip the philanthropy event to make up for it, is the exact reason fines are set in place. If you were actually studying and came to the sorority in advance - they would have arranged a separate philanthropy event for you to attend after the LSATs just like they do for every other girl.

Seniors cry at rush because they are so sad to be leaving the house. I have life long friends from my sorority experience. we had so many memories in our house and it was sad to be at our last rush. I'm sorry that you cannot be emotionally connected to fellow classmates in this way. For that, I do feel sorry for you.

You say you feel degraded by what the greek system imposed on you and that you feel the young ladies of Cornell are old enough to handle themselves. Well, by looking at your facebook pictures one could argue that you could use a little more structure and that after deactivating, you are continuing to degrade yourself just fine without the sorority.

As an outsider to the Greek

As an outsider to the Greek system, I do not know what goes on within and among houses, but I, like many others, can only rely on the recount of experience that occasionally surfaces, such as Katie's editorial. There are over 40 fraternities and 11 sororities on campus, each with their own traditions yet changing classes every year and to make generalizations about everyone involved in the system is unfair. Personally, I have not had the most pleasant experiences with at least a few of the houses because of the irresponsibile behavior that I have observed, especially with respect to alcohol.

My own personal experiences aside, what this article addresses is the institutional sexism that might exist in the Greek system, as illustrated by the incident described at the beginning of the piece. By "institutional", I mean a recurring behavior. If (sexual) harassing a young woman in public is part of a ritual or tradition to be able to enjoy the brotherhood that some of the most loyal members of the system advocate, then that is an indication of the sexism that exists in at least one fraternity. Furthermore, if there are no rules and/or enforcement governing this behavior from the respective legislative bodies, yet this kind of government is within its jurisdiction, then that would be an example of the institutional sexism that exists in the fraternity system, and Katie's editorial provides evidence for that.

However, if none of my assumptions about fraternity customs and the rules that might govern them apply, then to the frat boys who harasssed Katie when she was walking in Collegetown: go learn some manners.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.