Opinion
Standing Up to Fight the War at Home
February 13, 2009 - 12:00amThis past Sunday evening I sat perched in Libe Café poring over Titus Andronicus and The War Between the Tates, and in the failing light I watched as half a dozen students lined the quad’s walkways with over a thousand black flags.
Witnessing these young people brave Ithaca’s brutal winter twilight warmed my heart, for in my naïveté I thought they were paying tribute to Black History Month.
Perhaps each black flag represented a fallen African American soldier in the Civil War or each African American imprisoned and murdered in the struggle for civil rights.
By the time I began my trek home it was too dark to make out the billboards accompanying the flags, but I imagined they celebrated the accomplishments of civil rights leaders such as Martin Luther King Jr. and Rosa Parks (and hopefully my high school’s favorite Black History Month hero: the late great Bob Marley).
But, boy, was I wrong. These enthusiastic flag planters weren’t celebrating the history of African Americans at all; they were protesting Israel’s conduct during the recent conflict in Gaza.
The gesture struck me as odd. Amidst the 25 or so ongoing conflicts in the world, two of the most deadly of which are being perpetrated by America, what makes Israel stand out?
It’s not the death count. Since 2000 — when the Palestinian-Israeli conflict known as the Second Intifada began — the Mexican Drug War, the War in northwest Pakistan, the Second Chechen War, the Baluchistan War and the genocide in Darfur have all claimed more lives in equal or less time.
To put the Palestine-Israel conflict in perspective, consider the estimated 9,000 Iraqi civilians killed in the Iraq War in 2008. That’s more casualties than the entire Second Intifada, civilians and combatants included. And 2008 was the Iraq War’s least bloody year: a conservatively estimated 90,000 to 100,000 Iraqi civilians have been killed since 2003 (or over one million casualties if you include combatants).
And then, of course, there is Afghanistan.
Israel doesn’t stand out from the pack because it attacked Gaza without provocation, either. Palestinians launched rockets into Israeli cities during a ceasefire, an offense far more substantial than the reasons America went to war with Iraq (read: nothing).
Comparatively, Israel’s conduct in this conflict is not exceptionally violent and is not unprovoked. So are we to conclude that this outcry resonates from a moral objection to the existence of the state of Israel? Why is Israel such a lightning rod for controversy? Is it because planting 100,000 flags for all the dead Iraqi civilians would be just plain tedious?
Indeed, there seems to be something awfully boring about the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. Some political activists would rather condemn the actions of Israel — a country in a far away continent — than confront the ongoing misdoings of their own government.
That is not to say that Israel should not be rightly condemned for its violent actions — just as those who act violently towards Israel should be condemned. But this hypocritical criticism of Israel lacks a degree of self-awareness.
Iraq and Afghanistan are no less occupied than the Gaza strip, after all.
50 years ago, in the face of another conflict equally as bloody, unfounded and futile as the Iraq War, Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. said, “I [can] never again raise my voice against … violence ... without having first spoken clearly to the greatest purveyor of violence in the world today — my own government.”
Cornell students once understood this. In the 1960s we staged sit-ins, organized demonstrations and rallied against the Vietnam War. On April 19th, 1970 — 11 years after the war began — 12,000 filled Barton Hall to capacity in protest against a war we knew was unjust.
Isn’t it sad that our generation didn’t show up when that torch was passed?
Do we really believe that we have the moral authority to condemn another country for doing on a small scale what America does on a much larger scale?
Have we really traded in meaningful political activism for a visually impressive but intellectually bankrupt display of black flags?
As Rosa Parks once said, “Each person must live their life as a model for others.” We cannot possibly expect Israel to choose peace over violence until we do first.
This task is not insurmountable. If the struggle for civil rights has taught us anything it is that over the course of a few years what once seemed impossible can become a reality. We can end the occupations of Iraq and Afghanistan, but first we must stop trying to dictate policy to the rest of the world. I understand some Americans identify more with Israel or Palestine than they do with the U.S., but when the Middle East does achieve peace, it won’t be because of anything the West did — especially not because of some flags plotted on a lawn in Upstate New York.
My only real advice for aspiring political activists who hope to change the world comes from the late great Bob Marley: “Open your eyes,” he said. “Look within.”
Happy Black History Month.

The issue needs to be put into perspective.
I'll use California as an example, because that's where I am. Adapt this perspective to your audience's area... What if Britain had agreed to give half of California to the Zionists so they could establish a "Jewish State" there? Would Californians have agreed to the UN partitioning their land? What if they didn't and the Zionists took it by force anyway? What if when you resisted you were bombed by an advanced military, and then labeled as "terrorists" for fighting back? What if the world sat back and just let it happen? The high mountain desert where I am would be our West Bank, and LA would be our Gaza strip. How do you explain sanctions and occupation to your kids? What if a nation like America funded and supported it? What about the displace people from San Fransisco, Sacramento, etc, do they ever get to go home? Who would your kids blame for all of the undue hardships in their lives? I wish for the best for the Jewish people, but not at the expense of someone else. It's time for the world to stand up for Palestine, for peace, and for the 'Right of Return'. It's time to set things straight, and make sure the whole situation is put into perspective. It's time for peace in Palestine, and we're not backing down.
what does it feel like twisting history?
I bet it feels really good! Doesn't it?
I assume it feels equally good that there were two people living in are at the time of partition. None of these people had a state and they were offered to share the land. One party refused and the war started. It continues up until today.
But who cares about all that when it is much more fun to blame the Zionists and draw completely incorrect hypothetical pictures. Hope you are having fun!
What would feel good!
If Israel were treated as just another foreign entity and not an Amerian obligation, there would be no need for the incessant bloviation about its "eternal innocence" compared to all its enemies.
And the drain on the American taxpayer to "respect an establishment of religion" would be considerably lessened.
Respecting a state religion violates the 1st Amendment of the United States Constitution. In principle, that would include any religious nation that has brutalized its neighbors - and then only under the American military umbrella - for decades.
I'm still waiting for ONE reason Americans should feel obligated to secure Israel. Any one??
To our shame. And to the security threat to the most exceptionally decent nation on the globe from nations that are more and more loathe to tolerate one-sided American support of a people who would destroy Muslims as valueless souls.
That WOULD feel good!! And be in America's best interests. Finally - after 60 years.
Not enough death & destruction > no need to protest
What unbelievable newspeak this is. "We shouldn't criticize Israeli state aggression because its assault killed much less than other wars!" Do you realize how screwed this logic is?
"Israel's conduct was not exceptionally violent"
Come to Gaza, and tell that, please, in person, to survivors as they sit in front of the rubble of their towns and as they tend to their maimed loved ones. Tell that to HRW, Amnesty International, and UNRWA. Tell that to the very victims of White Phosphorus, and High Explosive flechette weapons.
Poor Orwell, spinning in his grave.
Some assorted thoughts
Cody, I must say that I found your response to be rather odd. The bulk of your article seems to be aimed at the fact that condemning Israel for their war in Gaza is somehow meaningless because there are other wars going on. I find this to be one of the most asinine messages I have ever heard. Just because there are bloodier, though certainly shorter-lived conflicts, going on in the rest of the world doesn’t mean we should ignore this one. If one really believes in being against wars, they should condemn all wars, which means, yes, mentioning even comparatively small conflicts. Furthermore, if one happens to be interested in a particular part of the world, and see an injustice there, it should be lauded that they try to bring that justice to the attention of others, rather than keeping quite because there are greater injustices elsewhere.
Furthermore, before enumerating the reasons you find Israel’s war comparatively justified, you should finish your research into the topic. You mention that Israel was provoked into attacking Gaza because there were rockets fired from Gaza. However, you completely avoid the fact that until the last week of the ceasefire, Hamas held to the terms of the truce, despite the obvious provocation of Israel, which violated the terms of the agreement both by continuing the blockade of the borders with Gaza, which they had promised as one of the terms of the agreement. Furthermore, according to The Guardian, Israel was the first to break the terms of the cease fire, when, on November 4th, the IDF sent a raid into Gaza killing 6 Palestinians. (http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2008/nov/05/israelandthepalestinians) If Israel was provoked into attacking Gaza because of the rockets, surely it is only fair to say that Gaza was provoked into firing the rockets in the first place.
You point that objecting to this conduct is a moral objection to the existence of the state of Israel, a veiled claim of anti-Semitism if I have ever seen one, is equally unjustified. Having read your list of wars since 2000 which were bloodier and somehow more deserving of reprimand than the Gaza war, I couldn’t help but notice that you completely failed to mention the Second Congo War, which killed an estimated 5.4 million people and was the bloodiest war in the world since World War II. By the logic you expressed, one would have no choice but to infer that you simply don’t care about this, since it is a sub-Saharan African war, and it would seem to imply racism. This is obviously a completely ridiculous statement. You not mentioning the Congo War doesn’t make you a racist. It means you chose not to mention in. In the same way, caring about the plight of the Gazans doesn’t make one an anti-Semite and it lowers the level of the discussion to imply such.
Rather than simply imply this is the reason Israel is such a lightning rod of controversy, it might be a better route to examine the reasons some of us care deeply about this conflict over others. Let’s think about reasons. Israel’s occupation of Gaza has been going on since mid-1967, or about 41 and a half years, while Iraq and Afghanistan have been going on for only a few. More important than this, however, is the fact that in Iraq and Afghanistan, there is an active effort by our country to solve the problem and bring the countries to a state of regularity. On the other hand, with the increases in settlers and Israel’s recent vote for Likud and Yisrael Beitenu, it is clear that there is neither contrition nor a real effort by Israel to resolve this conflict.
Maybe everyone should be reminded that 40 years ago, when Martin Luther King Jr. was speaking out about the Vietnam war, saying “I [can] never again raise my voice against … violence … without having first spoken clearly to the greatest purveyor of violence in the world today – my own government,” his own government was already supplying the arms and equipment necessary to facilitate the occupation of Gaza and the West Bank.
To close, I have to ask… are you attempting to discredit a meaningful effort to bring a attention to a major world issue, enabled by the United States’ one sided conduct, with the intellectually bankrupt argument that the United States attacks people too so those of us who care are incapable of being opposed to violence elsewhere? If this is what you really believe, I think you may have missed the real messages of both Mrs. Parks and Dr. King.
Outstanding Mr. Mecham!!
I can add little more to your well-reasoned commentary.
Would that others - with the ability to weigh conflicting interpretations of this ghastly unending bloodshed honestly - were courageous enough to begin to question the standard "mythology" regarding the "moral" superiority of zionism.
And begin to resent the lavish assistance America GIVES - and has given - Israel with no apparent concern as to how it has been, and is being, used.
I have heard NO ONE address one major question: why is Israel an American concern AT ALL?
Except maybe Peter Novick, a University of Chicago history Professor and Jew, who addressed it in his book "The Holocaust in American Life". He concluded the answer to my question (above) was: 'it should not be'.
To the extent America has been motivated by compassion for Israel following WWII, it is long since past time we reconsider its validity "In American Life".