Opinion

World Class B.S.: Why Cornell Workers Need a Fair Contract

April 21, 2009 - 11:00pm
By Tony Manfred

Overgrown quads crawling with ticks. Cracked sidewalks unplowed in mid-winter: impassable. Showers caked with inch-thick mold. Classrooms dusty, dirty and unkempt. Dorm bathrooms still reeking of last weekend’s now-hardened vomit. Dining hall buffets empty. Scared, starved students calling out to mommy in bewilderment. A university unhinged, rendered inert.

This description of life without Cornell workers is overly dramatic, of course. A lame attempt at shock and awe. But what would become of our school without the services provided by these workers? How much are their services worth?

At the very least these services are worth a sustainable income. If you work at Cornell you should make enough to provide yourself with life’s necessities. All Cornell workers should be able to afford three meals a day, sleep in an adequately heated home, go to the doctor when they’re sick and, most importantly, live life with peace of mind. They shouldn’t have to worry about how they’ll put food on the table tonight, how they’ll pay the doctor when their child gets sick or how they’ll be able to keep the roof over their head two months from now. This is not too much to ask. This is not an impractical demand more applicable to a utopian America. This is what’s just. This is what’s necessary.

Cornell’s track record on labor agreements can best be described as, “OK.” But as the nation’s economy sickens, the workers who work damn hard to ensure that the nightmare described in this column’s first paragraph isn’t realized are falling critically ill. Those who once felt stable now anxiously endure sleepless nights, and those who once just squeaked by are now forced to fall back on food banks and government housing. Some of those who cook our food can’t do the same for themselves.

Circumstances are dire, but not hopeless. As the UAW Local 2300, the union that represents the aforementioned grounds, custodial, dining and other maintenance workers, starts up negotiations with the University, Cornell has an excellent opportunity to establish its position as a leader in fair labor practices by providing its workers with a fair contract.

This contract must reflect the value and nature of what these workers do.

Some call these men and women “unskilled” workers who perform simple manual tasks, undeserving of wage over the minimum eight bucks an hour. This is an easy argument for us aspiring white-collar professionals to make; after all, we are going to be doctors and lawyers and bankers and professors, far too “skilled” to cook and clean and mow. But this arrogance blinds us from the immeasurable practical value of these workers. Not only do they work incredibly hard, not only do they do their jobs exceptionally well, but they also truly care on a personal level. At a recent discussion panel about this issue several Cornell employees made a point of referring to Cornell students as, “our students.” These men and women care not only insofar as they worry about keeping their jobs, but are also truly concerned about their students’ health and livelihood. They are a committed, hard-working group who constitute the lifeblood of one of the most prestigious academic institutions in the world. A fair contract is the least of what they deserve for their service to this University and its students.

So what does this fair contract entail?

The principle obstacle toward a sustainable income for Cornell workers is a New York State law that essentially forbids employees of academic institutions to collect unemployment insurance during the months they don’t work. This law was passed so that douche bag teachers with stable salaries wouldn’t pad their wallets with unemployment checks during the summer. But the law covers all academic employees, not just teachers, which screws over the dining and other workers who really need unemployment insurance when faced with three months without pay. This issue will be especially problematic this summer, as significantly fewer summer job opportunities are available.

Cornell needs to step it up and remedy this problem.

The University needs to use its considerable lobbying power in Albany to change that state law. But that’s a long-term solution, and workers don’t have that kind of time. As summer looms, worried workers are scrambling to find any sort of job that’ll get them through August.

So it’s time for Cornell to pay up. If the state of New York won’t allow unemployed Cornell workers to collect unemployment, the University needs to pay unemployment insurance to each worker it purges at the end of every Spring.

This is a bold step that would affirm Cornell’s commitment to a dedicated workforce that literally allows this University to function. With these upcoming labor negotiations, Cornell has an opportunity to lead other institutions into a new era of sustainable incomes for workers. Yes, these are tough times, but this University isn’t exactly bankrupt. Our endowment is a cool $5.39 BILLION and our income is greater than many Fortune 500 companies.

If the University has the cash to import marble, why can’t it provide its employees with a sustainable income?

If I’m not mistaken, a little dance troupe called the Pussycat Dolls are rolling onto Ithaca next Friday at the cost of about a quarter of a million dollars. Yet dining employees are working their asses off in Okenshields all day only to take the bus to the soup kitchen after work. Cornell holds itself to high standards, but some of the workers who make this so-called prestigious academic institution function can’t even afford goddamn groceries. It’s some world-class bullshit. But if we students get behind our workers in numbers, we can make the administration alive to its ignorance. Even if we can’t affect policy change, we can at least shame the powers that be into realizing their own absurdity.



Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

It seems to me that the

It seems to me that the problem of fair wages at Cornell is indicative of the larger problem in our country. The rich are getting richer, and the poor are getting poorer. Back in the 1960's, the janitor and the CEO both earned living wages. Now, the CEO is flying high, while the janitor can't even scrape by. I think we need to return to a country where everyone, no matter education or skill level, can earn a dignified existence. This is not socialism! This is valuing each person's contribution as having some meaning--enough meaning to survive on.

What do we really know?

Before I go on, I want to point out that I consider myself to be very "liberal" on labor and social issues. I agree with anon that the level of inequality in this country is sickening. I hate how capital can be concentrated so that 3-4 businesses dominate every industry, but a concentration of labor is looked down upon. I hate how this concentration of capital allows businesses to screw workers over because they have no other options.

But I am very wary of criticizing the University over issues that we know absolutely nothing about. Tony, what do you really know about the situation of Cornell workers? Do you know how much they make? What are their hours? What are their conditions. You said that workers go to the soup kitchen after work - is this true or are you just lying? This article smacks of "liberal reactionaryism" - you see an issue, and automatically you have your opinion, but there is absolutely, and I mean absolutely, NOTHING in this article that would provide any evidence whatsoever that Cornell workers are being abused.

Now, given what I know of the world, and of Cornell - both of which is very little - I would guess that you were right and that the workers should make more money. But I don't know this, so I wouldn't go writing about it like you did. And if you do happen to know something that isn't in this article, then you should put it in.

What do we know? Only what we open our eyes long enough to see.

Tony pretty much hit the nail on the head. My partner is a "temporary worker" at one (sometimes more than one) of Cornell's West Campus dining halls. He began working here in August of 2008, then was "laid off" from December through February, asked to "finish out the semester" from late February through May. So, there was a three month period where his income was zero, a coinciding 1.5 month period where MY income (work-study, don't even get me started) was zero. I know a lot of us have never had to deal with unemployment, but let me let you in on a little secret. It's terrifying. There is nothing and I mean NOTHING like knowing you can't pay your rent or buy food. There is nothing like the shame you feel in this "pull yourself up by your bootstraps" society when you apply for food stamps. What happens when summer rolls around and he has no work AGAIN? I don't know. No summer courses for me, no parties, no traveling. I'm going to be working a forty hour workweek instead of being a student and he's going to stress and worry and apply and apply and APPLY until he finds something. Maybe.

Fellow students, open your eyes. It's not like Tony needs to "prove" any of this. It's common sense. When you're not here in the summer or over winter break, this place shuts down. Dining halls close or reduce their output immensely. So what do they do to offset the losses caused by 80% of everyone leaving? They fire, no wait, "lay off" their employees until it's convenient for the university to hire them back. So, do everyone a favor, quit pretending you don't know what's happening here. The problem is, I guess, that you've never actually *had* to think about it. No time like the present.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.