My column today was motivated by a current controversy on our campus and by the larger issues it represents. Articles in the Cornell Review’s orientation issue have once again put issues of civility, diversity, and free speech squarely before our campus community and the greater Cornell family. The views as expressed in the Review articles — one focused on minority students and one satirically linking Muslims to terrorism — were clearly at odds with the values of our university. The current controversy raises three broad issues: 1. How should we as a campus respond to writings and other forms of speech that target certain groups within our campus community in ways that many find offensive? 2. How can we foster a robust discussion and civil debate of contentious issues in ways that are respectful of political and intellectual diversity? 3. When it comes to hurtful or hateful speech, is there a certain line that we as a university won’t let people cross?