Parity's the Name of the Game in Ivies

By ryan | March 9, 2001

The Ivy League baseball teams are about as even as can be. No one school has yet proven that it will rise above the rest of the pack, making for a pair of very appealing races i n the Gehrig Rolfe Divisions. With the departure of possibly the two best pitchers in the league from last season, last year’s division titleists — Dartmouth and Princeton — will be easier to bring down. How do the teams stack up? The preseason pick to win the Ivy crown is defending champion Princeton — but the Tigers have a tough road ahead of them, and this is as far from a sure thing as it can get. Here is this season’s team-by-team breakdown, with a few comments from Cornell head coach Tom Ford.

Gehrig Division

1. Princeton

Last year’s Ivy champ led the Gehrig division with a 13-7 record, but will have to cope with the early departure of ace Chris Young, who signed a pro contract for the Pittsburgh Pirates. Senior Max Krance does return, however, sporting the league’s best batting average last year (.389). The Tigers also feature last season’s saves leader, sophomore David Boehle. Although there are no superstars like Young on this year’s squad, Princeton is still loaded with talent and has an excellent chance to take the division again.

Ford says: “They’ve been pretty much unbeatable, but now, obviously, [Young] is gone.”

2. Cornell

The Red went 11-9 last season in league play to finish two games behind league champ Princeton. Ford’s troops are led at the plate by junior outfielder Erik Rico and on the mound by junior Brendan McQuaid. After winning six of its last eight Ivy games to finish the 2000 campaign, Cornell will look to continue that momentum right into this season.

Ford says: “There’s not much separating us [from Princeton, Dartmouth, and Brown].”

3. Penn

The Quakers’ 9-11 Ivy record (third place in the division) last season can be easily improved upon this season if the pitching staff gels like it is supposed to. Ten pitchers return from last year’s squad, but there is no definitive closer. Jeff Gregorio rounds out the battery and should also lead the offense. The loss of shortstop Glen Ambrosius should be counteracted by the return of the rest of the infield. Sophomore Andrew McCreery will split time between pitching and the outfield, and should provide help in both spots.

4. Columbia

The Lions pulled up the rear of the division last season with a 6-14 mark, and in order to climb out of the cellar they will have to improve on a horrid defensive showing. Columbia was last in the league in both team ERA (8.80) and fielding percentage (.934). Junior Adam Schwartz will have to pick up the slack for the pitching staff. Senior first baseman Peter Aswad will lead the offense after leading the Ivies in RBI (51) and tying for the league lead in home runs with 10 last season.

Rolfe Division

1. Dartmouth

Last season’s Big Green squad had, at 17-3, easily the best regular season record in the Ivy League. The division champs will be burdened by the absence of Conor Brooks, last year’s senior who led the league in ERA (1.92), wins (eight), innings pitched (79.2), and strikeouts (84). Dartmouth also lost James Little and Brian Nickerson, who topped the Ancient Eight in hits and homers, respectively. It will be up to junior John Velosky to ensure that the Green’s pitching staff remains the best.

Ford says: “I look for [Dartmouth] to be up there fighting for it again. They lost their best pitcher, but they have pretty good depth at pitching.”

2. Brown

The Bears finished last season with an 11-9 Ivy record, good for second in the Rolfe Division, and are in position to contend for the title again. Brown returns seven of its nine position players, including senior shortstop Dan Kantrovitz. Two years ago as a sophomore, Kantrovitz won the Blair Bat Award for the top Ivy hitter. Classmate Todd Larussi, last year’s Ivy leader in doubles, centers a speedy outfield. On the hill, Jim Johnson, a two-time all-Ivy choice, leads the starters.

Ford says: “They’ve had a pretty good run of it the last couple of years, and they have a good crew, especially their best pitcher, who’s coming back as well.”

3. Harvard

The Crimson had a disappointing season last year, finishing third in the division at 10-10 after three straight titles. In order for Harvard to rebound, it will have to improve on the worst team batting average in the Ivy League (.260). Junior shortstop Mark Mager is a threat to steal bases and, along with classmate Faiz Shakir, forms a solid double-play combination. Senior hurler John Birtwell could very well be the best pitcher in the league this year.

Ford says: “I know Harvard’s going to jump back and be stronger this year.”

4. Yale

After having the worst record in the Ivy League last year and finishing last in the division at 3-17, the Bulldogs don’t show many signs of improvement. They lost their best pitcher, Sudha Reddy, to graduation, and the hitting corps also took a hit. The Elis’ bright spot is junior pitcher Jon Steitz, who fanned 48 hitters in 54 innings of work last season. Classmates Matt McCarthy and Craig Breslow will also boost the bullpen.

Archived article by Alex Fineman

Dragon Day Rivalry Neared

By ryan March 12, 2001

No, this time the dragon won’t be fire-breathing. Nor will it be slayed by a mighty knight. It will, however, roll through campus on the feet of dozens of freshman architecture students to its fiery resting place on the arts quad. Carrying on approximately one hundred years of the legend’s unveiling, architecture students will parade their medieval masterpiece this Thursday for Dragon Day. Engineering students have yet to disclose the nature of their rival contraption that they will brandish outside Philips Hall on the ceremonial day. One of Cornell’s hallowed traditions, the freshman students of the College of Architecture, Art and Planning spend weeks envisioning and constructing the dragon, which is transported from Rand Hall to the Engineering quad, and back to the arts quad through Ho plaza. During the ceremony, traffic on central campus is restricted. The dragon then meets its fate in a bonfire on the Arts Quad. About 70 architecture students started building the dragon on Saturday. The end product will fuse several students’ ideas for the dragon. “The students experiment with new ways of moving things — how the head moves, how the wings flap. Sometimes, it works, sometimes it doesn’t,” explained Brian Beeners, advisor for the architecture students. All students participate in some way in building the dragon. “Different people are doing different things depending on what they are interested in. Upstairs people are painting the windows of the building. A lot of kids are raising money with t-shirts,” Maeve Curtin ’05 said. “It’s bound in tradition.” “It’s great to design and build something and make it come alive,” Stephanie Horowitz ’05 said. The engineering students have also been busy working on an enterprise of their own. “We only work on weekends and we’re restricted on time,” said Michelle Engler ’03, president of the Phoenix Society. Still, Engler emphasized, “I feel that it’s pretty neat to be in charge and put it together.” To pay for the necessary materials for each projects, students from both colleges designed and sold t-shirts. Steeped in legend, the beginnings of Dragon Day stretch back to the ideas of Willard Straight 1901, an architecture student himself. He decided that the then-called College of Architecture, should have a day to celebrate its students. The occasion was dubbed “College of Architecture Day.” Students made orange and green banners to hang from Lincoln Hall, then part of the architecture school. They adopted St. Patrick’s Day as the time for their celebration, and eventually added the legend of St. Patrick chasing the serpents from Ireland. No one knows for sure the exact year that the celebration began. The general consensus is that it emerged sometime between 1897 and 1901. The concept of the dragon appeared in the 1930’s and it was then that the Dragon Day name was adopted. Over the years, the theme of Dragon Day slowly developed into the celebration that Cornellians cherish today. Starting in the 1950’s, the students started to actually build dragons. Dragon Day has been used as a day for political statements as well. To support the repeal of Prohibition in 1933, students constructed a paper-mache beer stein. In 1968, the dragon was painted black as a rebuke against the Vietnam War. In past years, students have made creative innovations to their fabrications that fascinated many people. “One time back in 1990 the University didn’t want to support [Dragon Day] and the students did it anyway. They floated the dragon on Beebe Lake,” Beeners said. In 1964 and 1976, the architecture students paraded the dragon through campus on cars. In 1993, the students were at last permitted to use materials from the architecture college to make their dragons. Even before permission was granted, architecture students used the facilities and materials of the architecture college to complete its underground project, according to Beeners. With some of the profits from the t-shirts they have been selling, a fund may be made to research the history of Dragon Day in greater depth. “A lot of this is legend. We want this to be a rich part of the history of the University,” Beeners said. During the Dragon’s evolution, a rivalry developed between the architecture and engineering students. It became a battle over creativity. The engineers were simply upset that they were not acknowledged as being as imaginative as their peers in Rand Hall. “The engineers started to destroy the dragon — they got mad since they said that [the engineers] were creative too,” Justin Melendez ’04 said. The rivalry was at times intense and violent. The engineers were known to throw frozen fruit and soda bottles full of dry ice at the dragon. “During the years [that the Phoenix Society] didn’t exist, the engineers hurled snowballs and insults,” said Prof. Timothy Healey, advisor of the Phoenix Society and chairman of theoretical and applied mechanics. In the1980’s, the engineering students channeled their competitive spirits and formed the Phoenix Society. Its mission is to demonstrate support for the engineers on Dragon Day and showcase their own creative skills. One year, the students decided to make a huge replica of the bird to show the diversity of their college. In 1987, they built a Viking ship. The society then dissipated for a few years. But, like the legend of the Phoenix, the society rose again from its ashes. “They resurrected themselves last year and built the phoenix,” Healey said. The Phoenix Society returns this year with a top secret project. The members have been working on the piece since mid-February. The days leading up to the square-off include pranks and some episodes of vandalism, including leaving stamps of dragons and gears all over campus. Students trail toilet paper around the Arts and Architecture quads and water balloon fights are known to break out. One year, the sculpture standing between Uris and Olin libraries was painted green. In 1966, students let a green-painted pig run loose in the Ivy Room. A large-scale food fight ensued, drawing concern from the Department of Public Safety. The food fight was an example of one of the major sources of conflict between the participants of Dragon Day and the administration throughout the years. There have been times, such as in1990, when the University did not want to support the day due to the possibility of violence. “This is what we worry about on Dragon Day — fist fights. Last year was the start of a new era of cooperation and comradery since in past years it hasn’t been this way,” Healey said. “Staff and students have sat down to coordinate [Dragon Day] so that it will be a nice, safe day.” Engler agrees with the new direction that Dragon Day is heading. “Last year was really funny. Everyone ended up hugging and talking after the water balloon fight,” she said, commenting on last year’s events. Archived article by Kelly Samuels
Cornell Mock Trial

By ryan March 12, 2001

This April, members of the Cornell Mock Trial Association will be disappearing into thin air. Well, not literally. The organization is headed for the national championships in Des Moines, Iowa, and the debate will be loosely based upon John Krakauer’s 1997 novel, Into Thin Air. Led by its president, Keith Becker ’01, the team will be arguing both sides of the fictitious legal dispute during the American Mock Trial Association National Championship at Drake University. The case involves an expert mountain climber who dies attempting to summit Mount Everest. The climber’s widow then sues the guides who accompanied her husband on the ill-fated trip. Members of the mock trial team will be divided into two teams of six — three lawyers and three witnesses — and both will argue the case for the plaintiff and the defendant. “It breaks down like a real trial,” said Becker. “We are scored by lawyers and law students based on our legal knowledge as well as the credibility of our overall performance. There’s a lot of acting involved.” The national championship is the final event in the three-level competition that began at the Yale Invitational Mock Trial Tournament in November. There, the Cornell team received tenth place out of 40 competing teams. Two members, Becker and Bethanie Ricketts ’02 received individual overall honors in the competition. In February, the team moved on to the regional competition at the University of Rochester, where they were one of four teams chosen from 25 competitors to qualify for the weekend-long national contest in Des Moines. This will be the fourth consecutive year that Cornell’s team has qualified for the national tournament, where they will contend with the top 64 teams in the nation. Among the teams present will be Ivy-League rivals from Yale and Columbia universities. “The atmosphere [at the national competition] is highly competitive,” said Jonathan Scharf ’02. “Part of the trial takes place in a real courthouse, which definitely raises the level of seriousness. Our goal is to have fun, but everyone takes it pretty seriously.” Scharf is one member of what Becker describes as “a really eclectic bunch of very ambitious, very intelligent people.” Becker himself has been president of the organization for the past three years. “[The Mock Trial Association] is an amazing activity that forces you to think critically on your feet, one of the most vital skills for a trial lawyer,” Becker said. Other members of the team offered positive remarks. “I have been particularly impressed with this year’s team,” said Nadia Drake ’02, who has been a member since her freshman year. “Everyone is exceptionally intelligent and we are all good friends. It’s a lot of fun.” The organization has approximately 40 members from five of Cornell’s undergraduate colleges and is “nationally recognized as one of the best teams in the northeast,” Becker said. The team’s success has been acknowledged through monetary support from various organizations within Cornell and elsewhere. This year, the Student Activities Funding Commission (SAFC) increased the team’s funding from last year’s budget of $3,833 to $5,767. “We [the SAFC] want to support groups that are successful in their endeavors and are actively bringing Cornell’s name elsewhere,” said Kira Moriah ’03, vice president of finance for the SAFC. This allocation is in the “upper-middle range” of subsidization in comparison to other student groups funded by the SAFC, according to Moriah. “[The Mock Trial Association] has demonstrated an active membership and responsible use of their funding in the past.” Mock Trial must currently raise between $4,000 and $8,000 to cover transportation costs to an from the national championships. In addition to the SAFC, the team also receives significant funding from Littler- Mendelson, a private law firm in San Francisco, which employs several alumni from the School of Industrial and Labor Relations and the Law School. “We have a difficult time publicizing the club’s success,” Becker said. “But those who have supported us recognized that we are advancing — a trend that I hope will increase in the future as we continue to be successful as an organization.” Archived article by Hillary Profita