The Cornell Daily Sun - Independent Since 1880

The Cornell Daily Sun (https://cornellsun.com/2002/02/07/killing-off-some-precious-time/)

February 7, 2002

Uncategorized

Killing Off Some Precious Time

By wpengine | February 7, 2002

When Harvard’s Tim Pettit beat senior netminder Matt Underhill back on Nov. 16 to open the scoring at the first Crimson-Red battle, one of the most impressive streaks Cornell owned at the time ended: a string of over 550 minutes without allowing a power play goal.

Despite a few bumps along the way, the unit is in fine form lately, posting a perfect record in the Red’s six game winning streak.

“It’s been a real strength for us for the last couple of years,” head coach Mike Schafer ’86 said. “It was a big strength for me here my first year when we won the ECACs. We were first in the country in penalty kill.”

“The penalty kill is one of the things that has won us some games this year,” agreed junior captain Stephen B

University Responds to Campus Diversity Issues

By wpengine February 8, 2002

President Hunter R. Rawlings III and Provost Biddy (Carolyn A.) Martin released a statement on Tuesday reiterating the University’s attachment to diversity in response to recent events on campus. “We ask the entire Cornell community to join us in reaffirming our commitment to diversity and inclusiveness,” Rawlings and Martin said in the joint statement. Factions of the student body questioned that commitment on Jan. 30 in a rally on Ho Plaza. “People have been engaged in dialogue over the past weekend,” said Linda Grace-Kobas, director of Cornell News Service. “The [University] wanted to reiterate their support of [these programs].” The statement responded directly to rally speakers such as Kandis Gibson ’04 who asked a crowd of over a hundred, “If the Cornell administration will not respect Asians, Blacks, Latinos, and Native Americans, why would the rest of the community?” According to the statement, “promoting respect for racial and ethnic diversity is one of the University’s highest priorities. “As an educational institution, we have a unique opportunity to foster an appreciation of the historical, social and cultural differences that shape this country. We have a responsibility to educate ourselves, not only about our own society, but about the histories and cultures of other societies as well,” it continued. For Grace-Kobas, “The [University] was concerned about the rally when people were questioning the University’s [stance on diversity],” she said. “The University wanted to respond to that. They are really concerned about issues of diversity and this [statement] is a way of reiterating that,” she added. According to the statement, the administration does respect minority students. “Our common goal should be an environment in which no student feels vulnerable to attack, harassment or exclusion because of his or her race or ethnicity.” Some students worry that the administration’s responses are insincere. “It’s very hard to see their statement as genuine. It seems almost ‘tokenistic,'” said Marc Rivera ’02. Others wonder if the administrators were acting out of strong feelings of pressure. “I think [the demonstrators] called for a statement,” said Funa Maduka ’04, the Student Assembly minority representative. “After reading the statement, I can’t say they said anything I haven’t heard before. It was all very nice but … they believe statements such as these will stand in place of funding. They’re putting statements where their money needs to be,” she added. The administrators’ statement, however, did mention a few projects that will obviously require funding. “The Africana Studies and Research Center is in serious need of renovation and some expansion. Renovation plans are under active discussions with the new director of the center, Prof. Don Ohadike, and we are looking for the most effective design,” administrators said. According to Ohadike, such discussions have in fact been quite successful. “Something is coming out of this but the University is worried about its financial position. If they have the will to do it, they can come up with the money,” Ohadike said. “They only need to convince themselves that what we’re asking for is reasonable,” he added. Ohadike added that the Africana Studies and Research Center is asking for funding to make the center into a place that looks and feels “less like a living center and more like a learning center.” Rivera, however, questioned the reality of the University’s financial problems. “I see in The Sun that they’re putting $14.5 million into the Statler. They’re spending money like water in other places, but they’re saying they’re hard up when it comes to ethnic studies,” he said. Archived article by Freda Ready
Lobbyists Assist Cornell in D.C.

By wpengine February 8, 2002

WASHINGTON D.C.. –Stephen Johnson knows that lobbyists don’t have the best reputation. The prestige ranking of lobbyists is only slightly above used car salesmen, according to Johnson, a lobbyist for Cornell and the assistant vice president for government affairs in office of university relations. Johnson, along with Legislative Associate Liz LaPolt MS ’99, visited Capitol Hill this week to learn about President Bush’s budget proposal and to find out what Cornell could gain from it. They represent Cornell’s interests in Washington, lobbying primarily for increased funding of agricultural research and student financial aid. If the pie is bigger, LaPolt explained, then they can bring home a bigger piece for Cornell. LaPolt and Johnson met with 15 Cornell-in-Washington students last night to talk about their role in gaining funding for Cornell programs. They vie for both public and private money. “We’re at the table no matter who’s serving,” Johnson said. Despite its lackluster reputation, Johnson calls lobbying, “a noble profession with biblical roots,” claiming that Moses was the first lobbyist when he represented the Israelites and said, “let my people go.” He characterized lobbying as a job for “effective communicators” who have exceptional interpersonal skills. Moreover, unlike many lobbyists in Washington, the Cornell lobbyists are not allowed to buy their influence. As a nonprofit organization, Cornell is prohibited from giving money to political action contributions, Johnson said. “We’d have to pay using your tuition dollars.” Instead, the Cornell lobbyists often team up with other schools and organizations to gain access to Congressional representatives and their staff. “Having different kinds of institutions work together on a bill is really advantageous,” Johnson said. “I’ve lobbied with nuns before. Nuns are great,” he said. “We lobbied with the Catholic church on tax issues.” Cornell’s lobbyists have also joined with the University of Colorado, Syracuse University, Dartmouth College, Northwestern University, and the State University of New York. “Most of our issues here are ones that affect higher education, and not just necessarily Cornell,” LaPolt said, adding that they work on issues pertaining to foreign students and taxes as well. Students also play a critical role in the lobbyists’ work. Every April, the office of government affairs cosponsors a “Student Aid Lobby Day” with Columbia University. The lobbyists try to arrange meetings between students and Congressional staff members, because while the staffers won’t always listen to the lobbyists, they will listen to their constituents. “They care about the constituents, they care about the people who vote,”Johnson said. Greg Andeck ’03 attended the discussion, and said he plans to participate in Lobby Day. “Since I want to be an environmental lobbyist some day, it will be a great way to get a jump start into the field.” LaPolt, who earned her masters degree from the College of Human Ecology in 1999, participated in Lobby Day as a graduate student three years ago. She said the Cornell lobbyists “step back into the shadow” when professors and students come to voice their opinions. “When we have guests on campus,” she said, “they’re the star.” Archived article by Heather Schroeder