Campus Couture

By wpengine | November 22, 2002

It happens all the time. We see a picture of a fabulous outfit on a gorgeous celebrity whose style we’ve always admired, so we rush to the department store in hopes of emulating the fantastic look, only to see the dressing room mirrors shatter at the horrifying outcome. Sadly, some styles just weren’t meant to be, we are better suited for certain looks over others, and, hanging our heads in disappointed defeat, we go back to the safe, tried-and-true outfits that have come to define and characterize us.

Why is it that some of us can pull of garish pink shirts and flashy fur coats while others can’t, and those same fashion iconoclasts fail horribly in classic prep while the former failures succeed in this style sector? The answer just might lie in the stars, in astrology, that is. Maybe the alignment of the stars and the Sun that you were born under has such an overwhelming cosmological force that it has considerable influence over determining your style, and you really can’t do much to change it.

Before you go dismissing this as superstitious nonsense, think about the high profile and style-conscious celebrities you see in the media. Perhaps you’ve always identified with the perfect refined elegance of Gwyneth Paltrow, admiring her for sharing your appreciation for high fashion. If this is the case, chances are good that you’re a Libra, a sign known for having an innate aesthetic sense. Did it occur to you that Paltrow is also a Libra? Strangely enough, other famous stars who share your’s and Paltrow’s penchant for classic glamour such as Catherine Zeta-Jones and sophisticated designer Donna Karan are Libras as well. Call it coincidence if you will, but astrology seems to be on to something! If this doesn’t convince you, you can keep pursuing your futile quest to wear something and be something that you simply are not. Otherwise, if you’ve been swayed by this line of hard fashion determinism, here’s a guide on how to dress according to the dynamic quirks of your astrological sign.

First, find your sign

then find your style.

Aries

*An Aries is characterized by his or her bold assertiveness, making one born under this sign a natural born leader. Style-wise, they are the trendsetters, setting bold fashion statements that everyone else wants to follow. Stylin’ Astrological Celebrity Counterpart: Sarah Jessica Parker. Definitive Designer: Jean Paul Gautier.

Taurus

*Taurians tend to be stubborn and grounded, as well as being very sensual creatures. They are usually brand name whores, fitting themselves only in the finest of fashions. Stylin’ Astrological Celebrity Counterpart: George Clooney. Definitive Designer: Louis Vuitton.

Gemini

*Geminis are the witty and flirty social butterflies who liven up the party. Like their dynamic personalities, their style is just as lively, being ever-changing and experimental. Stylin’ Astrological Celebrity Counterpart: Angeline Jolie. Definitive Designer: Anna Sui.

Cancer

*Cancers are sensitive and very in tune with their emotions. They prefer the classic comfort mode of clothing. Stylin’ Astrological Celebrity Counterpart: Tom Cruise. Definitive Designer: Ralph Lauren.

Leo

*Leos, being the showy drama queens that they are, want to draw just as much attention to their appearance, opting for overindulgence in top-notch, opulent clothing. Stylin’ Astrological Celebrity Counterpart: Jennifer Lopez. Definitive Designer: Versace.

Virgo

*Virgos are rational and practical perfectionists. As a result, they go for neat, understated minimalism and subdued, neutral tones. Stylin’ Astrological Celebrity Counterpart: Sean Connery. Definitive Designer: Calvin Klein.

Libra

*Libras are romantic people and have a taste for the aesthetically pleasing. They are then trendy by nature and are always impeccably dressed in the most sophisticated styles. Stylin’ Astrological Celebrity Counterpart: Gwyneth Paltrow. Definitive Designer: Giorgio Armani.

Scorpio

*Scorpios live up to the stinging connotations of their sign, being emotionally intense and changing their styles according to their torrent change in moods. Stylin’ Astrological Celebrity Counterpart: Larry Flynt. Definitive Designer: Moschino.

Sagittarius

*Sagittarians are spontaneous and curious, and their style can be labeled as comfortable, natural, no-nonsense, and no-fuss. Stylin’ Astrological Celebrity Counterpart: Katie Holmes. Definitive Designer: Miu Miu.

Capricorn

*Capricorns are the ambitious go-getters always dressed for success. Their clothes convey motivation and practicality. Stylin’ Astrological Celebrity Counterpart: Jude Law. Definitive Designer: Bill Blass.

Aquarius

*Aquarians are sharp and shrewd, whose perceptive intelligence allows for them to be the creative innovators of our world. Like their originality, their style is quirky, colorful, and offbeat. Stylin’ Astrological Celebrity Counterpart: Princess Caroline of Monaco. Definitive Designer: Betsey Johnson.

Pisces

*A Pisces is warmhearted and empathetic, running on emotions and instincts. Because they are so open to everything, they are compatible with all styles. Stylin’ Astrological Celebrity Counterpart: Jon Bon Jovi. Definitive Designer: FrostFrench.

Archived article by Sherry Jun

Forum Raises Farm Worker Rights

By wpengine November 25, 2002

A forum organized by the newly formed Cornell Farm Worker Advocacy Coalition was held last Thursday evening in Uris Hall. A series of speakers ranging from local migrant farm workers to the director of the Cornell Migrant Program spoke to an audience of about 40 people about important issues currently facing farm workers in upstate New York. The panel of six stressed the lack of human and labor rights afforded to migrant farm workers in the state and how students could help gain fundamental rights for the workers. This was one of the first events of the new student organization, started to get Cornell students more involved in helping local farm workers. Migrant farm workers, of which there are approximately 47,000 in New York alone, often migrate or perform seasonal labor on different kinds of farms, ranging from harvesting fruit such as apples, grapes and cherries, to work on dairy farms. While the National Labor Relations Act of 1995 entitles most workers to many fundamental labor rights, farm workers are exempt from this legislation and therefore are exempt from most labor laws considered standard for other industries in the U.S. The panel explained and illustrated many examples of such laws, including the right to workmen’s compensation and sick leave, minimum wage and freedom from harassment. A highlight of the program were three farm workers, Irlain Theodore, Aleus Hilaire and Augustin Dumerci, who spoke about their experiences during the past 15 to 20 years. Each told a similar story of coming to the United States from the Caribbean and the various jobs they had worked as a farm worker since that time. While each had been in the industry for a number of years, none had received any more substantial increase in payment for work and experience. They all spoke of working in conditions where managing farmers withheld payment for long periods or infinitely, and without water or light. While some of the workers expressed their enjoyment of farm work in general, they all hoped that and actively encouraged their children to succeed enough to be employed in other industries. Because conditions are so poor for farm workers, and real wages have actually decreased over the past thirty years, Hilaire asked the audience who would harvest their food in the future, implying that conditions were so bad that soon everyone would leave the industry. The efforts of organizations such as the United Farm Workers and Rural and Migrant Ministries have been able to lobby legislatures on behalf of farm workers and to organize farm workers themselves to increase their power. However, the latter has remained quite daunting because the workers are not even given the right to organize or unionize. The panel stressed the importance of empowering farm workers themselves, rather than continuously advocating for them. “Farmworkers are the ones leading the charge; we’re helping them along the way.” said Bill Abom of Rural and Migrant Ministries. The idea for the new student groupcame last year from several students and Herb Engman, director of the Cornell Migrant Program, an outreach program which began in 1971 as the Agricultural Manpower Project, part of the department of human development in the College of Human Ecology. Engman spoke extensively about many of the local issues affecting farm workers as well as systems in which Cornell students and faculty have worked on behalf of local farm workers in the past. During the latter part of the program, Engman and members of the Rural and Migrant Ministry as well as some audience members talked about the potential help that students could give by lobbying the state legislature, doing research and creating a knowledge base about farm worker issues for students. Several of the student founders have engaged in independent work during the school year or summer through local organizations. Rebecca Bixby, president of Cornell Farm Worker Advocacy Coalition, and Pilar McKay worked on a field interview project this summer, involving interviewing migrant workers across N.Y. about sanitary condition across the state. Alyson Greenlee, another organizer of the Cornell Farm Worker Advocacy Coalition, worked for Rural and Migrant Ministries this summer. “Before working [at the Rural and Migrant Ministries], I had no idea that this issue existed, because farm workers are totally hidden from everyone. And even in school, you don’t learn that they don’t have the same rights as other workers,” Greene said. “Even in ILR, we spent maybe one day learning about how farm workers are exempt from most labor laws.” Discussion between the audience and the panel veered towards the immense structural causes of farm worker impoverishment and lack of rights. While they are being oppressed by farmers, many of the farmers are not making large profits at all and are in turn oppressed by the distributors and supermarkets who sell the food. “There’s an incredible variation, and it’s not based on need, it’s based on production,” Engman said. “The biggest earners are the truckers, processors and grocery stores.” Bixby said that the struggle is “definitely something that Cornell students can and should be involved with, in the way that it relates to ongoing policy changes regarding immigration and documentation” Archived article by Aliza Wasserman
Canadian Parliament Member Speaks

By wpengine November 25, 2002

A current member of the Canadian Parliament and former Canadian Minister of National Defence, Art Eggleton, spoke this past Friday in Goldwin Smith Hall’s H.E.C. Auditorium on Canadian-U.S. Relations since Sept. 11. The talk was sponsored by the Canadians at Cornell Club, the largest Canadian student organization in the Ivy League. Debunking Myths Eggleton said that he wished to “debunk sad myths” that seemed to develop after the terrorist attacks. These myths include “Canada [being] portrayed as a haven of terrorists” and concerns over the Canadian-U.S. border, the longest undefended border in the world. Eggleton said that Sept. 11 “awakened us all to new dangers [and] ushered in new challenges for Canadians and Americans alike.” The president of the Canadians at Cornell Club, Daniel Braun ’04 — a Canadian citizen — said, “When Sept. 11 hit, I didn’t feel like a foreign citizen and it hit close to home … I’m sure other Canadian students felt the same way.” First Country Eggleton said that Canada was the “first country outside of the U.S. to respond” to Sept. 11 and “among the first countries to offer assistance for what would eventually become Operation Enduring Freedom.” Eggleton noted that the “Canadian contribution [is] going largely unreported.” Just three months after Sept. 11 the Canadian government finished work on their budget, with nearly “seven billion dollars [reserved for] all initiatives.” These initiatives include the Smart Border Initiative, which is an attempt to “create a seamless yet secure border” with the U.S. According to Eggleton, “more than one hundred billion dollars U.S. cross the border everyday” which is more than the U.S. trades with all of the European Union countries combined. Though Canadian military assistance was provided for Operation Enduring Freedom during Eggleton’s term as Minister of National Defence, he noted the existence of “growing discomfort with American unilateralism.” Referring to an explanation given to him by Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld for American unilateralism, Eggleton said, “It is the mission that will define the coalition and not the coalition that will define the mission.” “The principle of multilateralism is still valid” so that the entire international community has a voice, Eggleton said. He added that the “very rules we now seek to circumvent may be the same rules we wish to evoke.” Eggleton also said “as a general principle preemptive action is fraught with dangers … the U.S. or other Western nations [do not] have an unblemished record [and] the solution we sought often [becomes] a problem later.” However, Eggleton noted that Canada is “not neutral when liberty and human rights are at threat” and that “we seek the same outcomes [as the US]: freedom and justice and peace.” “We in Canada are not a militaristic nation, nor do we spend a lot of money on the military,” Eggleton said. He also stated that “perhaps it is because we share so much with you [Americans] and think so much of you that we expect so much of you,” adding that “if war is being inflicted on our friends we rise to the occasion.” Audience members had the opportunity to ask questions after the lecture. One member asked about Canada’s involvement in the United State’s alleged violation of Geneva convention resolutions concerning the treatment of prisoners. Canada passed custody of prisoners they captured in Afghanistan to the U.S. with “assurances the U.S. would follow Geneva conventions,” Eggleton said. He noted that the main issues over prisoner treatment centered on whether the captives were prisoners of war or unlawful combatants. Organizers said they felt lucky to have such a prominent speaker come to Cornell. “Eggleton’s lecture was informative and insightful,” Braun said. “He is at the forefront of Canadian decision making.” Archived article by Brian Kaviar