Softball's Title Dreams Slip With Losses to Tigers

By wpengine | April 21, 2003

The softball team (24-6, 7-3 Ivy) headed into the weekend riding a six-game winning streak and looking to take the lead in the Ivy League, as it squared off against first-place Princeton on Friday (18-12-1, 8-1). However, the defending champion Tigers asserted their dominance, sweeping the Red in a doubleheader by scores of 8-3 and 8-7. Cornell, led by a no-hitter from junior pitcher Sarah Sterman, rebounded the next day to sweep Penn, however, to remain in the hunt for the Ivy crown.

In the opener, Princeton’s offense, aided by two Cornell errors, drew first blood, scoring three runs in the top of the third to break a scoreless tie. The big hits in the inning came from Kristin Lueke, who tripled, and Melissa Finley, who doubled in a run.

Cornell struck back in its half of the third, though, when freshman MacKenzie Ryan hit a solo shot that drew the Red within two runs. The Red closed to within 3-2 in the bottom of the fourth when sophomore Lauren May smacked a solo home run to straight-away center field.

Princeton would score runs in each of the final three innings via the longball to blow the game open, however. In the fifth, Finley hit a two-run homer to extend the margin to three. Teammate Erin Valocsik hit a solo roundtripper in the sixth, and Erin Snyder hammered a two-run home run in the seventh.

Snyder earned the win in the opener, pitching a complete game, while allowing just three earned runs.

The Tigers opened the second game in the same way they ended the first one — hammering the ball. After Lueke led off the nightcap with a walk, Cristina Cobb-Adams gave Princeton an early lead with a two-run homer.

Cornell fought back to tie the score in the bottom half of the second, when junior Erin Sweeney delivered a key two-out RBI single that plated sophomore Melissa Heintz and Ryan.

Once again, Princeton responded, scoring a single run in the fourth before taking the game in the fifth. The big blow in the fifth inning came courtesy of Snyder, who launched a grand slam to right field. Princeton, would then add a run in the top of the seventh to extend its lead to 8-2. The Tigers needed every one of those runs, as the Red came charging back in the bottom of the seventh, striking for five runs. Junior Sandra Alvarez smacked a three-run homer and sophomore Caitlin Warren hit a solo shot in the inning. However, the Red fell short, falling by a run.

“It was very disappointing for us,” coach Dick Blood said of the losses. “We were totally outplayed. We were out-hit, out-pitched, and they played better defense. We didn’t play very well.”

Part of the problem for the Red was containing the normally light-hitting Princeton offense, which hit five roundtrippers in the two games.

“They hit the ball a ton,” Blood said.

Cornell bounced back on Saturday, though, taking two from Penn (7-23-1, 1-9) to remain in the Ivy hunt. Sterman was the star of game one, throwing a no-hitter, the first of her Cornell career and second in program history. Freshman Whitney Smith threw the Red’s first no-hitter earlier this season.

“The kids played exceptional defense,” Blood said. “[Sterman] was throwing a lot of offspeed pitches, getting people out in front, and popping the ball up.

“It was very exciting. It was nice to see her get that,” Blood added.

Alvarez gave Sterman all the support she needed, doubling in May in the second inning to give the Red a 1-0 lead. May would give Sterman an insurance run, hitting a solo homer in the fourth.

Sterman took care of the rest, facing just 23 batters while striking out two and walking one in earning the win.

In game two, May provided the offense once again. After Warren homered in the second inning to give Cornell a 1-0 lead, May connected for her third home run of the weekend in the third inning, a two-run shot to give Cornell a 3-0 lead. Heintz hit an RBI double later in the inning to give Cornell added insurance.

Freshman Kristen Landis earned the win, throwing six innings while allowing just one unearned run.

“I was pleased with the way we rebounded,” Blood said.

Also on Saturday, Princeton, split a doubleheader with Columbia, leaving it two games ahead of Cornell in the race for the Ivy title with four games remaining for both squads.

“We’re not out of the race because they did split with Columbia,” Blood said. “We need to win our four games next weekend and have them split.”

However, before Cornell finishes its Ivy slate next weekend against Yale and Brown, it will travel to face Syracuse tomorrow at 3 p.m.

Archived article by Alex Ip

U.N. Human Rights Lecture Packs Statler

By wpengine April 22, 2003

Mary Robinson, former United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights and former president of Ireland, addressed a packed Alice Statler Auditorium last night as the recipient of this year’s Henry E. and Nancy Horton Bartels World Affairs Fellowship. The fellowship recognizes Robinson’s pursuit of universal human rights initiatives through her past work with the United Nations and through her current project, the Ethical Globalization Initiative. Introducing Robinson, President Hunter R. Rawlings III underscored the pertinence of her global efforts. “[Robinson’s] visit is especially appropriate given the current world situation, [including] the war in Iraq and its aftermath,” Rawlings said. Robinson’s address emphasized the need to implement human rights initiatives that not only protect civil and political liberties but that also honor economic, social and cultural rights, which include food security, access to clean water, education, health care and other elements that constitute a decent standard of living. In discussing human rights policy, Robinson specifically articulated her admiration for Eleanor Roosevelt’s contribution to the U.N.’s Universal Declaration of Human Rights, a document which was drafted upon the creation of the U.N. Referring to the declaration as “an extraordinary breakthrough for mankind,” she applauded Roosevelt’s efforts to include as many worldwide traditions as possible in the creation of a universally applicable code of human rights. “The world was gifted with a charter that matters in every single country,” she said. “[If the document reflected] a Western agenda, it would not be a universal one.” In her address, Robinson also recalled the worldwide spirit with which nations approached human rights initiatives at the turn of the millennium and contrasted this enthusiasm with post-Sept. 11 attitudes that she said have prioritized human security initiatives over human rights. She expressed her disappointment that the Millennium Development Goals, human rights initiatives drafted by the U.N. in 2000, were neglected following the terrorist attacks, saying, “There seems to have been a tradeoff between human rights and human security.” Championing simultaneous implementation of human rights and security measures, she said, “[We need to] make an important new link between the protection of human security … and the protection of human rights.” Finally, Robinson emphasized the individual’s responsibility in fostering a community that values human rights. “[Every person] has duties to the community, without which the individual cannot develop [attributes] of personality,” she said. Robinson’s comments elicited both applause and critique from audience members. Many members of the audience commented on Robinson’s eloquence. “She was very well-spoken,” said Tajrina Hai ’05. “There were no questions she left unanswered.” Audience members were also impressed by Robinson’s work with the U.N. “I was very impressed by her work as the human rights commissioner,” said Prof. Wayles Browne, linguistics. “I enjoyed her description of how the human rights commission works,” added Tomer Malchi ’03. Critics of Robinson referenced human rights issues that Robinson did not address in her lecture. “One of the bigger problems she failed to touch on were the corporations,” Malchi said. “Corporations have more economic power than some nations.” In addition to drawing applause and critique, Robinson’s comments also inspired global analysis. “The Universal Declaration of Human Rights was a big milestone in getting countries to agree that there are some rights that everyone ought to have,” Browne said. “Every country ought to help the U.N.” Archived article by Ellen Miller
Straight Takeover Recalled

By wpengine April 22, 2003

In remembrance of the Willard Straight Hall Takeover, The Sun is reprinting, verbatim, the original account of the events taken from the Sunday, April 20, 1969, extra edition published the day after the takeover began. On April 19 of that year, students from the Afro-American Society occupied the Straight regarding several issues and grievances which had created tensions over the preceding months between University administrators and African-American students on campus. The following Sun article was written by former Managing Editor C. Barton Reppert ’70. This week, the African Latino Asian Native American Program Board (ALANA) is holding events for Willard Straight Hall Takeover Week, including a film screening at Robert Purcell Community Center at 8 p.m. tonight and a “Retracing the Steps of the Takeover” event on Thursday at 6 p.m. at the Straight. University officials and faculty representatives were slated to reconvene this morning to continue deliberations over yesterday’s takeover of Willard Straight Hall by about 100 members of the Afro-American Society (AAS). Steven Muller, vice president for public affairs, said late last night, “We don’t want to use any kind of police action” to clear out the building. But Muller emphasized that “this does not mean that we will not use police at any time.” About 50 members of Students for a Democratic Society (SDS) kept up a picket line late into the night at the Straight steps, in support of the AAS takeover. SDS decided early this morning at an almost silent meeting in Anabel Taylor Auditorium to rally at 11 a.m. and march on the site of the administration-faculty meeting. A sleep-in was also planned for Anabel Taylor, where an estimated 300 people geared themselves for a night of continued discussions centering around “contingency plans.” The takeover, which began shortly before 6 a.m. yesterday, jarred out of bed about 30 parents visiting Cornell for Parents Weekend and caused a temporary shutdown of WVBR before the radio station moved to a clandestine remote studio. The day-long occupation and picketing were marked by no violence except for a morning fight between white counter-protesters — who stormed into the Straight — and the black students, along with some SDS members. Sparking the takeover was Thursday’s decision by the Student-Faculty Board on Student Conduct to impose reprimands on three members of the AAS allegedly involved with harassment incidents last December, during agitation for a stronger Afro-American Studies program. The AAS protest action yesterday followed by one day the burning of a small wooden cross in front of Wari, the COSEP women’s co-op at 308 Dearborn Place. Also heightening campus tensions were more than a dozen false fire alarms since Friday. The AAS announced yesterday that its members would give up their takeover of the Straight only if the University drops all charges against the black students in connection with the December demonstrations, and undertakes “a full and thorough investigation of the recent cross burning and the subsequent actions of the campus police.” Edward L. Whitfield ’71, chairman of the AAS, told The Cornell Daily Sun last night that another request, concerning improved housing for blacks, was withdrawn because “the people in Ithaca hadn’t been consulted properly.” Whitfield said AAS members “handled everything very tactfully” in the start of the takeover yesterday, which resulted in the ousting of about 40 Straight employees as well as the 30 overnight guests. Commenting on the effectiveness of the SDS picket line, Whitfield said, “If they’re able to explain to students the importance and the legitimacy of what we’re doing, that’s fine.” The AAS chairman declined to speculate on how yesterday’s takeover might affect prospects for the new Center for Afro-American Studies expected to open next fall. The Board of Trustees voted April 12 to budget $240,000 for financing the Center in 1969-70. A University press release issued last night said yesterday’s session with the administration, Faculty Council and “other faculty and student representatives” arrived at “no final conclusions during its three hours of deliberation.” The release added that, “At the present time individual efforts intended to achieve further understanding through discussions with the black students in the occupied building, as well as other student groups, are under way.” Asked about the administration’s rapport with the AAS, Muller said, “There have not been representatives of the society in our discussions.” He added that the occupation of the Straight, which serves about 6,000 meals a day, would cause “considerable inconvenience” to the University community if it continues through tomorrow. Shortly after the black students started their takeover yesterday, a WVBR announcer interrupted regular programming at 6:03 a.m. to introduce a “relevant political message.” A person identified as Whitfield then came on the air to say AAS members had assumed control of the building because of what they called the University’s “racist” policies and lack of a program relevant to black students. About 75 SDS pickets had gathered with placards in front of the Straight by the time a special convocation was slated to commence at 9 in Alice Statler Auditorium. President James A. Perkins had been scheduled to address the convocation on “Prospects for Stability,” but Mark Barlow Jr., vice president for student affairs, told the audience of about 80 parents that the event was canceled. C. David Burak grad, as SDS spokesman, then mounted the stage to explain the group’s stance on the Straight takeover and bicker briefly with some of the parents over SDS ideology. “We feel it is ethically incumbent upon white people to support [the black students’] efforts for self-determination,” Burak said. One woman leaving the auditorium commented to her husband, “he’s just grinding out the party line.” About an hour later, Perkins issued a statement saying the seizure of the Straight was “both an astonishing and a regrettable action on the part of some black students claiming to speak” for the AAS. “It is astonishing because of Cornell’s program for both the admission and special education of black students,” Perkins said. “It is regrettable because it has cut across the plans of many months’ standing for entertaining several thousand parents of Cornell students.” The statement added: “The black students within the building have been informed that they must leave. A refusal to do so will set the stage for any one of a series of alternate actions by the University community.” Burak returned to the area in front of the Straight to lead a rally of the SDS pickets about 11:30, while several of the SDSers scuffled with counter demonstrators. The AAS statement distributed about this time by SDS charged: “This administration, faculty and liberal student body let six black students wait four months with a suspension charge hanging over their heads, for no reason whatsoever.” The students cited in the December incidents had been repeatedly told they would face automatic suspension unless they appeared before the conduct board. It was later ruled that the board could decide their cases whether or not the students appeared. The AAS statement further charged: “The University chose to disregard the mental health of those six brothers as it had chosen to disregard the physical health of the black inhabitants of the Ithaca community.
…” The main conclusion the AAS said it drew from these conditions was that “Cornell University is a racist institution which holds nothing for blacks but degradation, oppression, insults and finally death.” Archived article by Sun Staff