By wpengine
September 12, 2003
At the beginning of the 2003 cross country season, and perhaps for the foreseeable future, youth will carry the women’s cross country team. At this early point in the season, only four of the top 12 runners on the team are juniors or seniors, and none of them have spent significant time in the varsity. In fact, none of the 12 finished in the top seven in any of last year’s postseason meets. Study abroad and a few varieties of freak illness are largely responsible for the team’s lack of upperclassmen at the start of the season. Juniors Amber McGown and Jenn Meil are both abroad for the semester, with plans of returning to the team next year, and classmate Kate Boyles and senior Jessica Parrott will both be limited in the early season as they recover from their various ailments. Boyles and Parrot are not gone for the whole season, though. “We fully expect they will be back, and back in time to make a significant contribution,” said Cornell head coach Lou Duesing. So far, Duesing noted, the top performers on the team are fittingly, two underclassmen — sophomore Mandy Knuckles and freshman Nyam Kagwima. “Mandy,” said Duesing, “is running extremely well. She’s had a very, very good summer.” And Kagwima, he noted, is well ahead of the average freshman. “I’ve been delightfully surprised,” said the coach. “You don’t expect an incoming freshman to be doing what she’s doing in the workouts.” Behind Knuckles and Kagwima, sophomore Emily McCabe leads a promising group of rising runners. Last season in track, McCabe set the school freshman record in the 10,000-meter run and comes into the season looking to bring some of that success onto the cross country course. McCabe is joined by classmate Angela Kudla, junior Carrie Richards (a Heps finalist in the mile), and senior Natalie Gingerich. Senior Kinsy Miller and junior Sarah Fischer round out the top group of returnees for the Red. Duesing made note of both of them for their hard work over the summer and their enthusiasm in practice. Four freshmen round out the top 10 for the Red. Erin Linehan, Megs DiDario, Robin Ellerbrock and Christy Paul have all enjoyed solid summers, and Duesing is looking for them to contribute to the team early. “They’ve all done quite well,” he said. “They don’t seem to be too intimidated [by the switch to college].” Senior captain Christine Eckstaedt provides the motivation, as she works her way back from a stress fracture. “Thus far, she’s done an excellent job as captain,” said Duesing. “She’s done a great job over the summer.” Fitness-wise, noted Duesing, the team is doing just fine. “People have really done a good job over the summer,” he said. “If we were to have all the people we thought we were going to have plus this group,” Duesing continued, “I’d be worried, because I wouldn’t have a place for everybody.” Of all the season’s meets, Duesing noted three that would provide excellent tests for the Red on the way to the postseason, the Iona Meet of Champions at Van Cortlandt Park in New York, the Paul Short Invitational in Bethlehem, Penn., and the Penn State Invitation in State College. “All three will have very large fields, but also very competitive fields,” Duesing noted. It all leads up to the Heptagonal Championships, on Oct. 31 at Van Cortlandt Park, and it won’t be an easy field. “It’s an extremely competitive conference,” said Duesing. “They’re all teams in the top echelon of the nation. While Columbia figures to have a stranglehold on the championship with a No. 9 preseason national ranking and almost all of last year’s Heps championship team returning, the competition for the next four spots in the field looks wide open. “It’s going to be who runs well on the day of the meet,” said Duesing. And where will the Red be? It’s hard to say. “How well we do as a team is how we progress as a team,” noted Duesing. That means, as he said, “People working together and people going into races not worried about pecking orders or where they’re supposed to be.” It’s all about working together and each team member picking up her part. And Duesing is confident his team can do that. “What I tell [the team] is: ‘Don’t waste time worrying about things you can’t control.’ The degree to which they follow that advice will define how good this season will be.”Archived article by Matt James
By wpengine
September 12, 2003
Peter Knight ’73, a senior advisor to several Democratic presidential campaigns, gave a lecture yesterday to an overflowing Kaufmann Auditorium, in which he discussed changes in American politics over the past thirty years. After discussing his experiences as a student at Cornell, Knight divided the main part of his lecture into four topics: the evolution of money’s role in politics, the changes in the political atmosphere in Washington since he became involved in politics, the difficulties campaigns face in communicating effectively with voters and a shift in key underlying structures in American politics. In his lecture, Knight addressed the ever-growing role of large amounts of money in politics over the course of his career and its effects on government and campaigns. According to Knight, many candidates for major offices are forced to spend 75 percent of their time raising money in order to remain competitive. He talked about a friend’s California congressional campaign, in which money dominated the race. “There was nothing [the candidate] could do in terms of talking with voters that would be as influential or effective as raising money,” Knight said. In the second topic of his lecture, Knight discussed what he sees as a near-total breakdown of across-the-aisle relationships and dialogue in Washington in the past decade. When he first came to Washington, Knight said, “After debating a bill in Congress with your opponent, you could go out to dinner together afterwards. This is no longer the case.” “We have gone from daily discussions to nothing at all,” he added. Knight attributed the deterioration of bipartisan relations in part to the increasingly aggressive media following the Watergate scandal and Republican resentment of the Democrats’ 40-year hold on the House of Representatives, which ended in 1994. However, in Knight’s opinion, the breakdown of discussions between the parties stemmed largely from Newt Gingrich’s tactics in the 1994 Republican takeover of Congress. According to Knight, these tactics were reflected in the impeachment of former President Bill Clinton. While Knight conceded that both Clinton’s policy and his personal affairs merited a certain amount of criticism, he said that in his opinion the former president did nothing that should have been construed as an impeachable offense. “It was the Republican political machine and the Republican political machine alone that led to the impeachment of Bill Clinton,” he said. Changes in the media industry and its audience over the past three decades have made it more difficult for candidates to get their message across to voters, Knight continued, noting that viewership of the nightly news has dropped from 92 percent in the mid-1970s to 19 percent today. Additionally, according to Knight, the three major networks at one time reached 80 percent of American viewers, but today seven networks compete for just 40 percent of news viewers. Candidates face additional difficulties due to the high cost of advertising on numerous stations in major markets. Knight does see one positive opportunity arising from these changes. He believes that candidates will have to learn how to conduct effective campaigns at the grassroots level. “The hero of the 2004 campaign is going to be the field manager,” he said. “The key to success in 2004 is making politics local again.” In his discussion of how some of the underlying structures of American politics have changed over the past three decades, Knight pointed to the success of conservative individuals and corporations in setting the current political agenda. He detailed the development of the modern neoconservative movement, tracing it to a 1971 memo written by soon-to-be Supreme Court Justice Lewis Powell, who was attempting to rally conservatives against a perceived increase in threats against the American enterprise system by pro-consumer, anti-corporate crusaders, most notably Ralph Nader. Knight described a system of “strategic philanthropy” employed by conservatives to create an effective counterbalance to liberal influence. “There was a long-term investment in their own [conservative] scholars and ideas,” Knight said, referring to the establishment of conservative think tanks and legal foundations that began at that time. “These conservative foundations set out to change the world — and they did,” he added. When asked why no similar development has taken place on the liberal side, Knight replied that in his opinion the Democrats are well behind the Republicans in terms of “clarity of purpose,” and that there are lessons to be learned from the success of the Republicans in recent history. He urged the audience to become involved in politics, saying that the only way change has ever occurred is through the actions of “small groups of thoughtful people.” Knight was inspired to become involved in the political arena by listening to the speeches and reading the work of consumer advocate Ralph Nader. In the mid-1970s, Knight worked with then-Congress member Al Gore, who was a member of the oversight subcommittee of the Commerce Committee. In this capacity, Knight and Gore investigated business practices in several major industries, notably tobacco and oil. Knight formed a close relationship with Gore and went on to manage Gore’s unsuccessful 1988 campaign for president. Knight achieved greater prominence as the chair of Gore’s vice-presidential campaign in 1992 and as the manager of Bill Clinton’s 1996 re-election campaign. More recently, Knight headed fundraising for the Democratic National Committee in 2000 and is now the managing director for MetWest Financial, a large asset management corporation. Isaac Kramnick, vice provost for undergraduate education, reacted positively to the interest Knight’s lecture attracted. “I was very pleased at the student turnout,” Kramnick said. “It was moving to hear his mixture of personal and political discussion and his years at Cornell when the campus was alive with passionate debate.” He added, “It would have been nice if there was more of a conservative turnout,” referring to what appeared to be an almost exclusively liberal audience judging from the lack of debate during the question-and-answer session that followed the lecture. Casey Holmes ’06 reacted positively to Knight’s lecture, seeing it as a call to arms for Democrats to get involved in politics and advance their ideas and candidates. “I think Democrats are going to be very adamant in [their efforts to] defeat Bush in 2004,” Holmes said. “[Knight’s] conclusion about the power of small groups of people having an effect on the world was inspiring.” Archived article by Daniel Palmadesso