October 9, 2003
Test Spin: JKettle
| October 9, 2003
On his website, Jkettle is described as a “mad genius.” That’s a pretty bold claim, given that most mad geniuses don’t spend their lives making obscure, minimalist, ambient music. If Jkettle truly were a musically talented mad genius, then he’d probably make some pretty exciting music. Well, Jkettle is not a mad genius.
Still, Momentary Delights is an enjoyable album. The majority of the songs are driven by pounding basslines and snare hits. The whole time I listened to this CD, I thought to myself, “Wow, the bass sounds like Jah Wobble” of Public Image Ltd. Given that the album is built around samples, I thought perhaps Wobble was used somewhere, so I checked the liner notes. Imagine, then, my surprise when I saw that the bass was actually played by someone who calls himself “Jah Josh Kotner.”
This little anecdote nicely summarizes what inhibits Momentary Delights in general: a lack of originality. I actually did like this album, but it seemed I had heard everything on it somewhere else, from the aforementioned bass to the French vocals on “Le Tease M’Attise,” which just reminded me of the intro to Les Savy Fav’s 3/5.
So how do I convince you that Momentary Delights is a worthwhile listen, even though I’ve been pretty tepid so far? Here goes. Even though this record reeks of derivation, Jkettle gets his inspiration from credible influences, already strong in their own right, and manages not to mess it up. Screw Flanders.
Archived article by Ross McGowan
We are an independent, student newspaper. Help keep us reporting with a tax-deductible donation to the Cornell Daily Sun Alumni Association, a non-profit dedicated to aiding The Sun.
October 10, 2003
In any given week, the defense focuses on one or two offensive stars. Harvard’s star, without a doubt, is quarterback Ryan Fitzpatrick. How to stop him, however, is another matter entirely. “I don’t know that you contain him,” said head coach Tim Pendergast. “He’s really talented. He runs well, very elusive — he’s like a very good tailback who’s also a very good quarterback. Extremely intelligent, he runs a lot of the offense right on the line of scrimmage. He’s sitting out there, and he just knows what you’re doing.” But Fitzpatrick’s skills aren’t just limited to his running ability and field vision, he’s an all-purpose player. The Harvard junior currently leads the nation in pass efficiency rating, and total offense at 406 yards per game. Last weekend against Northeastern, when he couldn’t find a receiver, he took care of business himself, finishing the day with two rushing touchdowns as well as two in the air. “This guy can throw the ball and he has receivers that can catch it whenever they want,” said Pendergast. “They don’t have to wait until they are behind to throw the ball. This is a team that likes to throw the ball. They like to spread you out.” Senior free safety Neil Morrissey echoed Pendergast’s comments. “Fitzpatrick, he’s up there to make plays. He’s going to throw first and run later, versus the other guys who run first,” he said. “So that’s the question we face, whether or not we’re ready for that, and I think we’re working on it.” While the top-ranked Harvard offense rolls into Scheollkopf this weekend, it will have to contend with the Ivy League’s leading pass defense. Currently ranked 10th in the nation, Cornell’s secondary has allowed just 141 passing yards per game. The players don’t see why tomorrow will be any different. “We are extremely excited about the fact that Harvard is coming in here with the top rated passer in the nation,” said Morrissey. “I think that poses a great challenge for our entire defense. “I think that we’re going to throw a lot of things at Harvard that maybe they haven’t seen.” But the same thing can be said for Harvard. After losing it’s top receiver, two-time Ivy League player of the year Carl Morris, to graduation, Harvard has found a new top wideout — Brian Edwards. Last week he hauled in seven receptions for 180 yards and two touchdowns. According to Pendergast, Edwards is just one of several weapons the defense will have to limit. “You have to have talent around talent in order to be good,” Pendergast said. “To be the type of offense that clicks for 530 yards a game, and [Fitzpatrick] leads the nation in offense — he’s a great player.” Still, the largest factor in limiting Harvard’s offense may not be stopping the run or the pass, it may just be Cornell stopping its own mistakes. “It’s not that our guys aren’t playing hard, it’s not that they aren’t trying because they are,” said Pendergast of the defense. “Fundamentals — you can go back and watch tape and if a guy goes in the wrong gap, it’s a fundamental breakdown. If the guy steps the wrong way, that’s a fundamental breakdown, and it’s something we need to clean up.” Cornell’s offense is a different story. Down 24-7 at the half last weekend, the Red mounted a 17-point comeback to knot the game in the fourth quarter. Senior quarterback Mick Razzano spearheaded the effort, throwing for 171 yards and one touchdown. Sophomore Josh Johnston led the way on the ground with 109 yards and one touchdown. The efforts impressed Pendergast. “The way I look at it, we scored offensively 17 points in 22 minutes,” he said. “That’s almost a point a minute, not quite, but it’s almost a point a minute. That to me is pretty good production by the offense. In addition, we only took 55 snaps, so that’s almost a point every three snaps.” Last weekend’s second half also seems to have boosted the confidence of the team. “We played a good game against Colgate, and we’re looking for big things against Harvard,” said senior receiver John Kellner. “It was a good stepping stone for us to come out and a and play a good second half against Colgate to get us going for this weekend.” Still, the key to besting Harvard doesn’t lie with one side of the ball. It’ll take a team effort to pull off a win tomorrow. “A lot of it is just consistency,” said Kellner. “It’s for us to be able to put together four quarters with all three cylinders clicking with our offense, and defense and special teams. We’ve shown signs of greatness in all of them, but we haven’t yet put it all together.”Archived article by Matt Janiga
October 10, 2003
On a campus as vast as Cornell’s and with weather as inclement as Ithaca’s, driving here is often perceived as a necessity. Parking, however, can be a nightmare. According to David Lieb ’89, Cornell’s communications and marketing manager, in the 2002-2003 academic year there were 42,283 parking tickets issued on campus. Of those, 6,842 were warning tickets that demanded no fine but informed recipients that their inspection or registration had expired. The 35,441 remaining tickets were issued with fines attached to them, at an average of $21.73 per ticket. Lieb noted that the parking enforcement is a “revenue mutual program.” The fines incurred pay for information and enforcement staff, equipment and staffing of the appeals department — funds that are not nearly covered by the fines on parking infringements. Approximately 52 percent of tickets were issued to students, with the rest being distributed among faculty, staff, visitors and vendors, according to Lieb. For the roughly 30,000 people on campus, there are approximately 10,000 parking spaces. As a result, he said, while the transportation department strives for flexibility, restricting parking is very important. Itay Budin ’07 disagrees. “The whole parking system is so stupid,” said Budin, who has a parking permit for North Campus and has received tickets for inadvertently forgetting to display his pass. On North Campus, the lot he parks in “is empty,” he said. “There’s so much room, it shouldn’t even be an issue.” As of Sept. 30, 979 campus residents had been assigned parking permits and 1,259 commuter permits had been given. Lieb said that this was “the lowest we’ve had in quite a while,” which he attributes to a recent push for students to leave their cars at home and take advantage of Cornell’s public transportation system. So far, 5,904 OmniRide bus passes have been sold on campus. This increase is largely due, Lieb said, to the transportation department’s “getting the word out earlier and more often to both our continuing and newly matriculated students.” The parking permit revenue is also lower than the actual costs of parking, so the department receives a subsidy from the University. In a case still pending a verdict on a re-appeal, one sophomore parked his car in early September on the left side of South Avenue in front of the fraternity Lambda Chi. The right side of the street bears two parking signs, one reading “No Parking Anytime” and another denoting permissible parking with a permit on Monday through Friday from 7 a.m. to 5 p.m. The left side of the street, however, bears no such signs. Edgemoor Street, which runs parallel, has parking signs on both sides of the street. The sophomore’s appeal of the $25 ticket was rejected, and after re-appealing three weeks ago, he still has not heard back from the Commuter and Parking Services Department. “I understand the department’s need to regulate parking; however, they should use more standard parking signs and put them in clearer places,” he said. Commuter and Parking Services manager John Durbin recognizes this problem, acknowledging that most violations “all fall back on signage and people being confused by what permit belongs there.” As a result, Durbin and Lieb enclose a piece of paper along with the parking permits listing the specific privileges associated with the permit. Lieb also asserted that there are no particular hotbeds for parking violations. “People are going to choose the closest spot to whatever building they need to be in,” he said. Archived article by Sarah Boxer