Cornell Remains No. 4

By wpengine | January 22, 2003

Not much changed among the top-five college hockey teams in this week’s USCHO.com poll. Cornell remained in fourth in the poll for the third straight week after it swept Union and RPI on the road, 6-0 and 3-2, respectively. Maine tenuously held onto its No. 1 position with a three-point weekend at its Hockey East rival, Merrimack. The Black Bears tied 5-5 on Friday before eking out a 2-1 Saturday night win.

However, the No. 2 team, North Dakota with the best college hockey record (21-2-3) had one more first-place vote (20) than Maine (19). The Sioux outscored Alaska-Anchorage 14-2 and won both their games while on the road to move up a slot this week.

Colorado College traded places with North Dakota as it tied Michigan Tech in Michigan on Friday, but came back to win on Saturday. New Hampshire rounded out the top five with a pair of one-point wins over UMass. UNH tied Dartmouth 1-1 on Wednesday.

According to the objective Pairwise Rankings, which is used to predict the NCAA tournament selections, Maine is at first place, followed by Cornell and North Dakota tied at second, and Colorado College in fourth.

Harvard was the only other ECAC team to crack the top 15 staying in the lucky 13th slot. Ivy rivals Dartmouth and Yale received six and one point, respectively. The Crimson is still the point leader in the conference, but Cornell moved up to second place trailing Harvard by only four points with four fewer games.

No. 10 Ferris State is the CCHA conference leader, and Alabama-Huntsville leads the CHA. UNH and No. 6 Boston College are tied at the top of the Hockey East standings, while Maine was one point behind them. Quinnipiac is ahead of the MAAC and North Dakota and C.C. lead the WCHA with 25 points a piece.

Archived article by Sun Staff

Off-Ice Contributor Recognized

By wpengine January 23, 2003

During his four-year career at Cornell, men’s hockey player Sam Paolini has endeared himself to Red fans with his game-breaking goals and gritty play. However, the senior forward’s presence has been felt not only on the ice but also in the City of Ithaca, where he has volunteered an enormous amount of time and effort to helping those less fortunate. In honor of his work, the Hockey Humanitarian Foundation Award selected Paolini as one of the five finalists for this year’s award last week. The award is presented to an NCAA hockey player who has demonstrated a commitment to excelling in the classroom and has made significant contributions to his or her community. “I’m very honored. It’s a surprise,” Paolini said. “I knew I was being nominated, but it’s a surprise knowing that I’m one of the final five.” From the moment he stepped onto the Cornell campus, Paolini has engaged himself in community activities. Over the past several years, he has served as a volunteer referee for the Ithaca Youth Hockey Association and he has been a guest speaker at local schools. He and his teammates have also raised money for the Ithaca downtown food bank, Loaves and Fishes. However, his two greatest contributions may be the programs which he initiated — Power Play for Prevention and Special Population Skate. The Power Play for Prevention program, which Paolini helped set up, will raise funds for the Ithaca Breast Cancer Alliance throughout the 2002-03 season. For every goal that the Red scores this season with the man-advantage, the Tompkins Trust Company will donate $100 to the cause. “With the Breast Cancer Alliance, I wanted younger women and women in general to be more aware of breast cancer in Ithaca,” Paolini said. For Paolini, though, the Special Population Skate, which gives handicapped children the opportunity to skate with members of the Red hockey team, is his favorite activity. “Probably the Special Population Skate is the most special to me because it happens every weekend. It’s something where I can directly affect it and directly affect people,” he said. “It started from nothing and slowly built its way up to something. It was the first one I did here too, so I hold that close to me.” After all his hard work, what Paolini finds most gratifying is the response he receives from those he has touched in the community. “Seeing the smiles on the kids’ faces on Sundays always makes me happy. And to see just random people come up me after games, or at school, on the street, and commend me or the work, and tell me how important the work I do for the community is, how they’ve been directly affected by the work I’ve done, if they have a friend or relative who’s been affected by breast cancer. Just the thanks — it helps me know that what I’m doing is worthwhile,” he said. Paolini’s work and dedication has not been lost on his coach, who views the senior as an example to everyone on the Cornell campus. “He’s a role model not only for guys on our team, but he’s a role model for other athletes on campus, he’s a role model for parents who live in town who don’t do anything in Ithaca,” head coach Mike Schafer ’86 said. “The nice part is that Sam has initiated everything that he’s done. He’s initiated the projects that he’s got going right now. It should be a part of every athlete to give back to the community. Sam’s very self-motivated, and he deserves the nomination into the top five and he deserves the award. The people that have won have been the people who have benefited from his involvement.” While Paolini is receiving attention for his contributions, he is quick to credit his parents, Sam and Diane, for instilling the values in him. “My mom and dad have always taught me that we’re lucky. There are some people who don’t have the fortunes that we do, and to be thankful for everything that we have. We have a responsibility to help people who don’t have as much as we do. It’s just something that they’ve always instilled in me since I was little,” Paolini said. “It’s going back to the Golden Rule, ‘Treat people the way you want to be treated.'” The other four finalists — John Flint (Saint Michael’s College), Chandra Gunn (Northeastern), Bryan Isola (Neumann College), Deanna McDevitt (Yale) — along with Paolini, however, will have to wait until April 11 for the winner to be announced at the NCAA Frozen Four Festivities in Buffalo, N.Y. Archived article by Alex Ip
Keep Rose Out

By wpengine January 23, 2003

For fans that dread the six-month winter hiatus, this baseball off-season has certainly filled the void. The break-up of Tom and Greg, the Puerto Rico Expos, the elimination of diapers in the clubhouse, shorter games — the list goes on. Perhaps the most interesting development since Game Seven has been the potential admission of guilt by Pete Rose. Rose’s fame does not lie in the fact that he is the league’s all-time hits leader, but rather due to his notoriously shady dealings while managing the Cincinnati Reds that led to his lifetime ban from baseball. No doubt, ask someone on the street and he is more likely to link Pete with gambling than with hitting. Despite the fact that officials currently hold in their gloves betting slips with Rose’s handwriting and thumbprint on them, Rose has vehemently denied any wrongdoing. There are numerous phone calls made between Rose, his gambling friend, and gambling contacts just prior to game time, but he says they were harmless. There are also bank records, an allegation that Rose ran up a tab of half a million dollars in unpaid dues to a pair of New York City bookies, 412 baseball wagers over a span of three months, and a signed document between A. Bartlett Giamatti, the baseball commissioner in 1989, and Rose detailing Giamatti’s factual basis for Rose’s lifetime ban. Despite that John Hancock, he maintains his innocence. Apparently, however, that 13-year refutation may be put to rest in the next few months, according to a report in yesterday’s Newsday. A close friend of Rose, who has met several times with commissioner Bud Selig over the past two months to discuss reinstatement, told the newspaper that he is willing to admit he bet on baseball. His admission would be the first of three steps Selig has outlined in negotiations that would lead to his reinstatement. Following admission, Rose must apologize and serve probation for “six to eight months,” according to a high-ranking baseball official. Supposedly, his admission could come as early as spring training, which would allow enough time for him to be placed on the 2004 Hall of Fame ballot. The executives responsible for selecting the Cooperstown candidates ultimately decide who appears on the ballot, but purportedly are merely waiting for reinstatement to include his name. I’m willing to bet that Pete wants back in baseball to get his grubby paws in more gambling. Jim Kaat, Rose’s pitching coach in 1985, said that he and his manager shared a love for betting and would do so together at the racetrack. For Kaat, however, it was a hobby. For Rose, according to Kaat, “there was probably a bit of an addiction there, a compulsion that I didn’t have that he did.” Old habits are hard to break. Rose is also hoping that with reinstatement will come a career in the sport. Honestly, though, what team would actually hire a man that for 13 years denied that he gambled in the face of evidence that would have committed even “money-bags” Simpson? And what about the 14 other guys who were banned from baseball for gambling? Are they still out or are they just not in because they do not have as impressive stats as Rose? For all those who believe that Rose should be reinstated if he admits he did it, do you think that if murderers on trial admitted they did it and said they were sorry that they should be allowed back into the very domain where they committed the crime in the first place? A stretch, perhaps, but no one would agree to setting murderers free, so how is that different from Rose’s situation? I will end with this comment Rose gave in response to being questioned if he got a thrill from gambling: “To be honest with you, I couldn’t watch it if I didn’t bet on it.” Whenever Rose was in the dugout or in the stadium, he was watching, so his own statement indicates he was betting too. If Rose does admit fault, he will be reinstated. Selig had a rough 2002 and needs a popularity boost. So, instead of upholding the rules and maintaining the holiness of baseball, the front office will bow to the public and give it an official Hall of Famer. Attendance is declining, isn’t it? Archived article by Katherine Granish