News
Reassignment of Ujamaa Director Causes Outcry
Univ. Temporarily Reinstates 20-Year Ujamaa Veteran for Upcoming Year
July 22, 2009 - 2:48amControversy erupted at the end of last month when the residential housing director of Ujamaa Residential College was abruptly reassigned to another position. This comes as the University starts its review of program houses on campus, leaving many students feeling that such housing is in a particularly vulnerable state.
Bowing to pressure from across the University as well as several alumni, the administration has since reinstated Kenneth Glover, residential housing director of Ujamaa, as the temporary head of Ujamaa for the upcoming academic year, but the situation is still alarming to a vocal group of students.
On Monday, June 29, Director of Residential Programs Joseph Burke informed Glover, residential housing director of Ujamaa Residential College, that he was to be reassigned to High Rise 5 after serving as head of Ujamaa for more than 20 years.
What followed was a storm of protest from students, staff, faculty and alumni against the abrupt decision and the perceived lack of transparency in how administrators handled the situation.
Within days, there was a Facebook group created by alumni, a Google Group created by students, and messages flying through various listservs about the situation. Ebony Ray ’10 said that she created the Google Group, entitled “Students for Ken Glover” because “she saw that people wanted to do something and she wanted to make sure that what everyone was doing was going to be heard in an organized fashion.”
Alex Muir ’10, a two year resident of Ujamaa and one of the student leaders of the movement, said, “Ken Glover is the sort of patriarchal figure for the Cornell administration to the Black/African American community. At Cornell, he’s constantly pushing for students who live in his building be they minority or not to strive to excel academically and broaden their horizons, and he’s just always there for students to the utmost.”
In a statement, Glover wrote that he made clear to Burke that he wanted to continue on as Ujamaa’s RHD, but Burke did not appear willing to change his mind. “There is no doubt in my mind that events like this do not accidently happen,” wrote Glover.
According to Ray, the issue at hand is not only that of Glover’s removal from Ujamaa, but also the fate of Ujamaa in the long run. With the program house review coming up this academic year, many are worried that Glover’s removal is an indication of the removal of Ujamaa as a program house on campus.
“I think the general sentiment is that the 'ethnic' program houses provide somewhat of a space for people of those respective backgrounds – a home of some familiarity,” Muir said. “My personal view is that the program houses should be viewed as a place of living and learning, and if the University endorses or promotes them correctly they can be viewed as an opportunity for people to learn about different cultures.”
“Students for Ken Glover” sent a letter to the administration demanding Glover’s job be reinstated, greater, institutionalized student input in future decisions of the same type and greater student and alumni representation on the program house review board. The group also encouraged people to personally send letters and e-mails and call relevant members of the administration to ensure that their voices be heard.
Burke then responded with a letter stating that due to the economic crisis and the fact that 423 employees accepted the early retirement package, Residential Programs was working to redistribute its resources. He said that they felt that Glover’s 20 years of experience would benefit the larger community in High Rise 5.
In the letter, Burke also stated that he had selected an outsider, Angela Ibrahim, to fill Glover’s position in Ujamaa. Ibrahim served as an interim residence director and a resident advisor as an undergraduate at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign and as an assistant residence director as a graduate student at the University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
Fil Eden ’10, a student leader of the movement, said, “This issue is about students not having a voice, which even in times of economic hardship, they should.”
As members of the Ujamaa community continued to push the administration, Vice President for Student and Academic Services Susan Murphy '73 released a statement on July 10 saying that Glover will be able to stay at Ujamaa for the coming school year. He will have the added responsibility of some work in one of the High Rise dorms. During this year, Glover will also assist Ibrahim with Jameson Hall and introduce her to the Ujamaa community.
“In January 2010, we will launch a search for a Residence Hall Director for Ujamaa. We will invite faculty and students to participate in the search process. By the end of the 2009-2010 academic year we expect to announce the new Residence Hall Director of Ujamaa to begin July 2010,” Murphy stated.
Olamide Williams ’10, student assembly vice-president and a student leader of the movement, said “I think Vice President Murphy realized how important Mr. Glover is to the community, but I think having him stay a year and then [deciding] what’s going to happen should be the choice of the community.”
Students are still pushing for greater control – they still want to know why Glover needs to be moved at all; they are demanding more power to govern Ujamaa as well as student and alumni representation on the program house review board.
“Ken’s reinstatement is a positive step, and a direct result of letters and e-mails. However, there is still a larger issue about program houses and the inclusion of student voices – that victory has yet to be won,” Ray said. “We need to lay a groundwork for the convention of these kinds of abrupt and rash decisions; personally I’m not done and I don’t think anyone else is either.”
Glover issued a statement on July 14 urging members of the community to continue fighting.
“…[O]nce again important decisions are made that will have a major impact on Ujamaa’s future without first formally consulting with Ujamaa’s faculty fellows, resident advisors, Ujamaa’s residents, Black students at Cornell, Black alumni, Ujamaa’s former and current residents and me,” wrote Glover. “I now understand why Ujamaa has struggled and patiently waited for more than five years to try to get new Ujamaa exterior building signs. When you consider that Cornell has built new residence halls on West Campus, one can legitimately ask when will Cornell renovate Ujamaa.”
According to Williams, people, especially those in the Ujamaa community, are now going to be much more active, and the administration will hear more from them.
“We are now demanding things that we felt we were not getting, such as painting in Ujamaa, more housing for students, a better facility, a better heating and cooling system, and just various other work orders,” said Williams. “The general thing is that Cornell is a community. It’s for everyone, and something is being taken away from a part of the community and to be frank people don’t know why, there’s not really a great reason for the administration to take it away.”

In Support of Mr. Glover
I'd like to offer my support for Mr. Glover. After comitting such a considerable number of years to working and living at Cornell, Mr. Glover knows best where he ought to work and reside. Mr. Glover has proven his passion and loyalty to resident life, the openness and accessibility of Ujamaa, to Black students and alumni, and frankly, to any student who takes the time to get to know him. In times of economic hardship, Cornell University can only benefit from the stable, positive presence Mr. Glover presents at Ujamaa. Mr. Glover should be wherever HE feels he ought to be.
RP's Attempt to Oust Mr. Glover
Residential Programs has been trying to remove Ken Glover for years, and worked underhanded in every way to force him out. Of all the RHDs currently in the employ of Cornell, Mr. Glover is the only one who has been there for over 5 years. Campus Life is trying to mold a certain department, and it is obvious that the experience and passion that Mr. Glover brings to the community is no longer appreciated. This has been a concerted effort by Joe Burke and the department to make the department they want, instead of the department that might best benefit the students and the university and community.
I think Glover should stay
I think Glover should stay in his current position for the time being, unless Ujamaa is closed. It is not, however, my decision and I am not naive to think I know everything relevant to the decision.
The final decision here should rest with Burke. HE knows best where Glover should live and work. Glover is an employee - and while Cornell can and should take his input regarding his personal work preferences, he shouldn't necessarily be able to ignore the larger administration and run his own private fiefdom.
The administration should NOT need to consult with
1) Ujamaa faculty fellows
2) Ujamaa RAs
3) Ujamaa residents
4) All black students at cornell
5) all black alumni
6) all former Ujamaa residents
7) Glover
8) the US congress
9) etc
before changing where this guy works. This is not the supreme court. Glover clearly has a grandiose vision of his position.
His statements implying administration racism regarding Ujamaa are laughable and show a surprising lack of understanding regarding how university building works. Many dorms at Cornell are in TERRIBLE shape, and Glover is complaining about lack of signage?
Burke should go, not glover
As a person with intimate knowledge of the situation I can say only this: we should be ousting Burke and not Glover. Joe Burke is a cold, unforgiving man with no ability to motivate his employees. He runs a nasty, bureaucratic and unfeeling organization which has looked the other way while those under its employ have been discriminated against, mistreated and altogether ignored. This is a symptom of a greater disease within RP. Let's transfer the leaders and not those hard working individuals who do their damnedest to provide Cornellians with decent living communities.
A Popular Solution
Why doesn't David Skorton invite Glover and Burke over to his house to talk about it over a beer???
Program Houses in General
I'm very interested to hear the findings of the Program House reviews. To be honest, I don't see much value in any of the racially-themed houses. If the they are a place for "living and learning," why not spread said learning to the rest of the residential community by encouraging minorities to integrate themselves into the community at-large as opposed to secluding themselves to a single dormitory?
Everyone has the right to voluntary association
I am an African American that graduated from an all White high school, and later Cornell University. I had a White girl friend in high school but she was "embarrassed" to go to prom with me because I was Black and her parents or friends did not approve. So when I came to Cornell, I was glad to be around people who accepted me for who I was and had common experiences. I lived in Ujamaa for one year. I was comfortable - I was able to drop my guard and relax for a change. I was not constantly being judged because of my ethnicity.
I believe everyone should have the right to voluntary association so they can experience life to the fullest. The majority at Cornell University - whites - do not have to set up Residential houses to voluntarily associate with their own group. With whites, voluntary association is an privilege automatically given. There are many other Residential Colleges are Cornell
Ujamaa gave me an environment where the African was the majority and the European was the minority - unlike my previous high school experience or later on when I began working in corporate America. Living in this type of environment helped me understand race relations better. It helped me to understand better how people thought of the minorities as a group and how minorities as a group thought of themselves. This is one of my most treasured memories and experiences. I was also able to forge long lasting relationships which continued years after I graduated which resulted from hanging out at Ujamaa on the weekends.
I believe people against Residential Houses do not want to see other groups of people convene and help each other out. They want to make it more difficult for minorities to organize and network. Conquer and divide has been the political strategy for many decades - this is a known fact. It is a conservative strategy of the majority with the objective to keep the status-quo or usurp power of the minority. When the power of a people is threatened, what do they do - fight! This is counterproductive to improving race relations. Groups should be allowed to associate freely and interact with other groups freely without any restrictions - destroying Residential houses would erect a barrier making this more difficult.